Home > Community Dashboard > Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females > Census Tract

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

green chart bars Significantly better than the overall value

red chart bars Significantly worse than the overall value

light blue chart bars No significant difference with the overall value

gray chart bars No data on significance available

More

Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females

Census Tract: 06111005203
Measurement Period: 2020
This indicator shows the percentage of women aged 65 and older who received recommended clinical preventive services during the past year. 

This includes: an influenza vaccination in the past year; a pneumococcal vaccination (PPV) ever; either a fecal occult blood test (FOBT) within the past year, a sigmoidoscopy within the past 5 years and a FOBT within the past 3 years, or a colonoscopy within the previous 10 years; and a mammogram in the past 2 years.
Data on all services in the core set are not available every year given the rotating core questions on BRFSS. The indicator should not be assumed to cover all recommended clinical preventives services for this age group.

Why is this important?

Utilizing appropriate clinical and preventive services can have important implications on the progression and treatment of many diseases. Individuals aged 65 and older who receive recommended clinical preventive services in a timely manner have greater opportunity to prevent disease or detect disease during earlier, treatable stages. 
More...

Census Tract: 06111005203

33.3%
Source: CDC - PLACES
Measurement period: 2020
Maintained by: Conduent Healthy Communities Institute
Last update: September 2023
Compared to See the Legend
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005203 has a value of 33.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 29.7% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 24.9%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005203 has a value of 33.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 36.7% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 31.9%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (31.3%), 06111005203 has a value of 33.3% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(31.3%)
Compared to the US Value (37.9%), 06111005203 has a value of 33.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(37.9%)
Technical note: Sub-county small area estimates use state and county data from the CDC's Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) in tandem with demographic data for census tracts and cities. It is not appropriate to use this data for evaluation purposes.
Census 2010 population counts and geographic boundaries data were used because corresponding Census 2020 population data are not available.
More details:
Click here for more information on how to use CDC - PLACES.

Graph Selections

Indicator Values
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Chart options:
  • Show Confidence Intervals
  • Disable zero-based y-axis
CountyCensus Places (Cities)Zip CodesCensus Tracts
Select a comparison
Loading...

Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females

:
Comparison:
Measurement Period: 2020
Data Source: CDC - PLACES
November 24, 2024www.healthmattersinvc.org
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
16.1% - 20.1%
20.1% - 25.7%
25.7% - 30.2%
30.2% - 34.1%
34.1% - 39.3%
There are 172 Census Tract values. The lowest value is 16.1%, and the highest value is 39.3%. Half of the values are between 27.8% and 34.8%. The middle (median) value is 31.7%.

Data Source

  • CDC - PLACES
    Note: This source uses Zip Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTAs) for its Zip Code data. Learn more
    Maintained By: Conduent Healthy Communities Institute (Methodology)

Filed under: Health / Older Adults, Clinical Care, Older Adults, Women

Related Content for: Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females