Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Prevention of Chronic Conditions by Promoting Healthy Lifestyles

This is a priority based on the 2022-2024 Community Health Needs Assessment, which includes:
  • Cancer
  • Diabetes
  • Heart Disease and Stroke
  • Nutrition and Healthy Eating
  • Physical Activity
  • Weight Status

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

green chart bars Significantly better than the overall value

red chart bars Significantly worse than the overall value

dark blue chart bars Significantly different than the overall value

light blue chart bars No significant difference with the overall value

gray chart bars No data on significance available

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Diabetes

Health / Diabetes

Health / Diabetes

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Health / Diabetes

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111008101

Current Value:

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111008101

8.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (9.8%), 06111008101 has a value of 8.7%.
Ventura, CA County Value
(9.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111008101 (8.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.7%).
Prior Value
(8.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111008101 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111008201

Current Value:

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111008201

9.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (9.8%), 06111008201 has a value of 9.0%.
Ventura, CA County Value
(9.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111008201 (9.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.0%).
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111008201 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111008202

Current Value:

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111008202

8.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (9.8%), 06111008202 has a value of 8.9%.
Ventura, CA County Value
(9.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111008202 (8.9%) is greater  than the previously measured value (8.2%).
Prior Value
(8.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111008202 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111008302

Current Value:

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111008302

9.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (9.8%), 06111008302 has a value of 9.8%.
Ventura, CA County Value
(9.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111008302 (9.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.8%).
Prior Value
(9.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111008302 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111008303

Current Value:

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111008303

9.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (9.8%), 06111008303 has a value of 9.5%.
Ventura, CA County Value
(9.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111008303 (9.5%) is less  than the previously measured value (9.6%).
Prior Value
(9.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111008303 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111008304

Current Value:

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111008304

10.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (9.8%), 06111008304 has a value of 10.3%.
Ventura, CA County Value
(9.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111008304 (10.3%) is greater  than the previously measured value (9.5%).
Prior Value
(9.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111008304 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111008305

Current Value:

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111008305

7.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (9.7%), 06111008305 has a value of 7.7%.
Ventura, CA County Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111008305 (7.7%) is greater  than the previously measured value (6.7%).
Prior Value
(6.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111008306

Current Value:

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111008306

8.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (9.7%), 06111008306 has a value of 8.7%.
Ventura, CA County Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111008306 (8.7%) is greater  than the previously measured value (8.2%).
Prior Value
(8.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111008307

Current Value:

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111008307

9.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (9.8%), 06111008307 has a value of 9.1%.
Ventura, CA County Value
(9.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111008308

Current Value:

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111008308

8.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (9.8%), 06111008308 has a value of 8.2%.
Ventura, CA County Value
(9.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111008401

Current Value:

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111008401

9.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (9.8%), 06111008401 has a value of 9.6%.
Ventura, CA County Value
(9.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111008401 (9.6%) is greater  than the previously measured value (9.1%).
Prior Value
(9.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111008401 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111008402

Current Value:

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111008402

8.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (9.8%), 06111008402 has a value of 8.9%.
Ventura, CA County Value
(9.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111008402 (8.9%) is greater  than the previously measured value (8.8%).
Prior Value
(8.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111008402 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111008500

Current Value:

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111008500

9.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (9.7%), 06111008500 has a value of 9.2%.
Ventura, CA County Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111008500 (9.2%) is greater  than the previously measured value (8.6%).
Prior Value
(8.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111008501

Current Value:

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111008501

9.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (9.8%), 06111008501 has a value of 9.7%.
Ventura, CA County Value
(9.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111008502

Current Value:

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111008502

9.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (9.8%), 06111008502 has a value of 9.6%.
Ventura, CA County Value
(9.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111008600

Current Value:

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111008600

11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (9.7%), 06111008600 has a value of 11.0%.
Ventura, CA County Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111008600 (11.0%) is greater  than the previously measured value (10.5%).
Prior Value
(10.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111008601

Current Value:

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111008601

10.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (9.8%), 06111008601 has a value of 10.2%.
Ventura, CA County Value
(9.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111008602

Current Value:

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111008602

10.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (9.8%), 06111008602 has a value of 10.8%.
Ventura, CA County Value
(9.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111008700

Current Value:

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111008700

10.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (9.8%), 06111008700 has a value of 10.3%.
Ventura, CA County Value
(9.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111008700 (10.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.3%).
Prior Value
(10.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111008700 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111008800

Current Value:

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111008800

10.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (9.8%), 06111008800 has a value of 10.2%.
Ventura, CA County Value
(9.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111008800 (10.2%) is greater  than the previously measured value (9.5%).
Prior Value
(9.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111008800 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111008900

Current Value:

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111008900

11.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (9.8%), 06111008900 has a value of 11.1%.
Ventura, CA County Value
(9.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111008900 (11.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.1%).
Prior Value
(11.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111008900 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111009100

Current Value:

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111009100

11.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (9.8%), 06111009100 has a value of 11.0%.
Ventura, CA County Value
(9.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111009100 (11.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111009100 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111009200

Current Value:

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111009200

8.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (9.8%), 06111009200 has a value of 8.4%.
Ventura, CA County Value
(9.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111009300

Current Value:

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111009300

9.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (9.8%), 06111009300 has a value of 9.4%.
Ventura, CA County Value
(9.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111009400

Current Value:

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111009400

11.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (9.8%), 06111009400 has a value of 11.3%.
Ventura, CA County Value
(9.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111009500

Current Value:

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111009500

11.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (9.8%), 06111009500 has a value of 11.5%.
Ventura, CA County Value
(9.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111009600

Current Value:

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111009600

10.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (9.8%), 06111009600 has a value of 10.2%.
Ventura, CA County Value
(9.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111009700

Current Value:

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111009700

11.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (9.8%), 06111009700 has a value of 11.8%.
Ventura, CA County Value
(9.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111980000

Current Value:

Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes Census Tract: 06111980000

0.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (9.8%), 06111980000 has a value of 0.0%.
Ventura, CA County Value
(9.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111980000 (0.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.0%).
Prior Value
(0.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111980000 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Diabetes

Adults with Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Health / Diabetes

Adults with Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Adults with Diabetes County: Ventura

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes County: Ventura

10.7%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Ventura has a value of 10.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (10.7%), Ventura has a value of 10.7%.
CA Value
(10.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (11.5%), Ventura has a value of 10.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.5% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Ventura (10.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.1%).
Prior Value
(11.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ventura value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Adults with Diabetes Census Place (City): Bell Canyon

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Place (City): Bell Canyon

10.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Bell Canyon has a value of 10.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Bell Canyon has a value of 10.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Bell Canyon has a value of 10.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Place (City): Camarillo

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Place (City): Camarillo

10.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Camarillo has a value of 10.9% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Camarillo has a value of 10.9% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Camarillo has a value of 10.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Place (City): Casa Conejo

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Place (City): Casa Conejo

9.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Casa Conejo has a value of 9.9% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Casa Conejo has a value of 9.9% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Casa Conejo has a value of 9.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Place (City): Channel Islands Beach

Current Value:
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Channel Islands Beach has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Channel Islands Beach has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Channel Islands Beach has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Place (City): El Rio

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Place (City): El Rio

14.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, El Rio has a value of 14.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, El Rio has a value of 14.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), El Rio has a value of 14.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Place (City): Fillmore

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Place (City): Fillmore

12.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Fillmore has a value of 12.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Fillmore has a value of 12.5% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Fillmore has a value of 12.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Place (City): Lake Sherwood

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Place (City): Lake Sherwood

10.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Lake Sherwood has a value of 10.8% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Lake Sherwood has a value of 10.8% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Lake Sherwood has a value of 10.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Place (City): Meiners Oaks

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Place (City): Meiners Oaks

11.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Meiners Oaks has a value of 11.5% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Meiners Oaks has a value of 11.5% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Meiners Oaks has a value of 11.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Place (City): Mira Monte

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Place (City): Mira Monte

12.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Mira Monte has a value of 12.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Mira Monte has a value of 12.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Mira Monte has a value of 12.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Place (City): Moorpark

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Place (City): Moorpark

9.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Moorpark has a value of 9.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Moorpark has a value of 9.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Moorpark has a value of 9.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Place (City): Oak Park

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Place (City): Oak Park

9.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Oak Park has a value of 9.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Oak Park has a value of 9.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Oak Park has a value of 9.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Place (City): Oak View

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Place (City): Oak View

11.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Oak View has a value of 11.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Oak View has a value of 11.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Oak View has a value of 11.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Place (City): Ojai

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Place (City): Ojai

11.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Ojai has a value of 11.9% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Ojai has a value of 11.9% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Ojai has a value of 11.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Place (City): Oxnard

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Place (City): Oxnard

12.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Oxnard has a value of 12.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Oxnard has a value of 12.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Oxnard has a value of 12.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Place (City): Piru

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Place (City): Piru

13.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Piru has a value of 13.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Piru has a value of 13.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Piru has a value of 13.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Place (City): Port Hueneme

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Place (City): Port Hueneme

12.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Port Hueneme has a value of 12.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Port Hueneme has a value of 12.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Port Hueneme has a value of 12.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Place (City): San Buenaventura (Ventura)

Current Value:
10.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, San Buenaventura (Ventura) has a value of 10.9% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, San Buenaventura (Ventura) has a value of 10.9% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), San Buenaventura (Ventura) has a value of 10.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Place (City): Santa Paula

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Place (City): Santa Paula

14.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Santa Paula has a value of 14.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Santa Paula has a value of 14.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Santa Paula has a value of 14.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Place (City): Santa Rosa Valley

Current Value:
10.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Santa Rosa Valley has a value of 10.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Santa Rosa Valley has a value of 10.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Santa Rosa Valley has a value of 10.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Place (City): Santa Susana

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Place (City): Santa Susana

10.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Santa Susana has a value of 10.8% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Santa Susana has a value of 10.8% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Santa Susana has a value of 10.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Place (City): Saticoy

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Place (City): Saticoy

11.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Saticoy has a value of 11.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Saticoy has a value of 11.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Saticoy has a value of 11.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Place (City): Simi Valley

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Place (City): Simi Valley

10.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Simi Valley has a value of 10.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Simi Valley has a value of 10.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Simi Valley has a value of 10.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Place (City): Thousand Oaks

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Place (City): Thousand Oaks

10.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Thousand Oaks has a value of 10.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Thousand Oaks has a value of 10.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Thousand Oaks has a value of 10.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 91320

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 91320

9.4%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (11.4%), 91320 has a value of 9.4% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 91320 (9.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (7.6%).
Prior Value
(7.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 91320 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 91360

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 91360

9.8%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (11.4%), 91360 has a value of 9.8% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 91360 (9.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (8.0%).
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 91360 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 91361

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 91361

7.7%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (11.4%), 91361 has a value of 7.7% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 91361 (7.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.7%).
Prior Value
(6.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 91361 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 91362

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 91362

8.5%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (11.4%), 91362 has a value of 8.5% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 91362 (8.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (7.3%).
Prior Value
(7.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 91362 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 91377

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 91377

7.6%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (11.4%), 91377 has a value of 7.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 91377 (7.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.4%).
Prior Value
(6.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 91377 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 93001

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 93001

9.9%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (11.4%), 93001 has a value of 9.9% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93001 (9.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.9%).
Prior Value
(9.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 93001 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 93003

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 93003

10.7%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (11.4%), 93003 has a value of 10.7% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93003 (10.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (8.8%).
Prior Value
(8.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 93003 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 93004

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 93004

12.2%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (11.4%), 93004 has a value of 12.2% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93004 (12.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.3%).
Prior Value
(9.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 93004 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 93010

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 93010

11.7%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (11.4%), 93010 has a value of 11.7% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93010 (11.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (8.6%).
Prior Value
(8.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 93010 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 93012

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 93012

9.0%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (11.4%), 93012 has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93012 (9.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (7.8%).
Prior Value
(7.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 93012 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 93015

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 93015

12.1%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (11.4%), 93015 has a value of 12.1% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93015 (12.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (13.7%).
Prior Value
(13.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 93015 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 93021

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 93021

10.3%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (11.4%), 93021 has a value of 10.3% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93021 (10.3%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (7.4%).
Prior Value
(7.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 93021 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 93022

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 93022

8.4%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (11.4%), 93022 has a value of 8.4% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93022 (8.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (7.8%).
Prior Value
(7.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 93022 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 93023

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 93023

9.0%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (11.4%), 93023 has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93023 (9.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (7.7%).
Prior Value
(7.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 93023 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 93030

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 93030

15.0%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (11.4%), 93030 has a value of 15.0% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93030 (15.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.8%).
Prior Value
(14.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 93030 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 93033

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 93033

15.8%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (11.4%), 93033 has a value of 15.8% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93033 (15.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (14.6%).
Prior Value
(14.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 93033 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 93035

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 93035

12.1%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (11.4%), 93035 has a value of 12.1% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93035 (12.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.6%).
Prior Value
(11.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 93035 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 93036

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 93036

13.7%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (11.4%), 93036 has a value of 13.7% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93036 (13.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.6%).
Prior Value
(13.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 93036 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 93040

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 93040

11.9%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (11.4%), 93040 has a value of 11.9% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93040 (11.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (14.7%).
Prior Value
(14.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 93040 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 93041

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 93041

14.2%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (11.4%), 93041 has a value of 14.2% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93041 (14.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (11.5%).
Prior Value
(11.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 93041 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 93042

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 93042

3.4%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (11.4%), 93042 has a value of 3.4% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 93043

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 93043

2.8%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (10.2%), 93043 has a value of 2.8% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(10.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93043 (2.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (5.3%).
Prior Value
(5.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 93060

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 93060

13.8%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (11.4%), 93060 has a value of 13.8% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93060 (13.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (14.5%).
Prior Value
(14.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 93060 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 93063

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 93063

11.2%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (11.4%), 93063 has a value of 11.2% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93063 (11.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (8.5%).
Prior Value
(8.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 93063 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 93064

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 93064

10.2%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (11.4%), 93064 has a value of 10.2% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93064 (10.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (7.5%).
Prior Value
(7.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 93064 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 93065

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 93065

10.6%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (11.4%), 93065 has a value of 10.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93065 (10.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (8.7%).
Prior Value
(8.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 93065 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 93066

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 93066

9.3%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (11.4%), 93066 has a value of 9.3% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93066 (9.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (11.1%).
Prior Value
(11.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 93066 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111000100

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111000100

10.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000100 has a value of 10.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000100 has a value of 10.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 06111000100 has a value of 10.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111000200

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111000200

12.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000200 has a value of 12.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000200 has a value of 12.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 06111000200 has a value of 12.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111000302

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111000302

12.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000302 has a value of 12.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000302 has a value of 12.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111000302 has a value of 12.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111000303

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111000303

11.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000303 has a value of 11.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000303 has a value of 11.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111000303 has a value of 11.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111000304

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111000304

14.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000304 has a value of 14.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000304 has a value of 14.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111000304 has a value of 14.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111000400

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111000400

15.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000400 has a value of 15.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000400 has a value of 15.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111000400 has a value of 15.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111000500

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111000500

14.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000500 has a value of 14.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000500 has a value of 14.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111000500 has a value of 14.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111000600

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111000600

15.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000600 has a value of 15.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000600 has a value of 15.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111000600 has a value of 15.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111000701

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111000701

14.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000701 has a value of 14.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000701 has a value of 14.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111000701 has a value of 14.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111000702

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111000702

13.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000702 has a value of 13.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000702 has a value of 13.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111000702 has a value of 13.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111000800

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111000800

12.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000800 has a value of 12.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000800 has a value of 12.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111000800 has a value of 12.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111000901

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111000901

12.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000901 has a value of 12.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000901 has a value of 12.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111000901 has a value of 12.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111000902

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111000902

12.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000902 has a value of 12.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000902 has a value of 12.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111000902 has a value of 12.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111000903

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111000903

11.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000903 has a value of 11.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000903 has a value of 11.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111000903 has a value of 11.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001001

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001001

10.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001001 has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001001 has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 06111001001 has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001002

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001002

11.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001002 has a value of 11.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001002 has a value of 11.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111001002 has a value of 11.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001101

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001101

10.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001101 has a value of 10.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001101 has a value of 10.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111001101 has a value of 10.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001102

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001102

12.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001102 has a value of 12.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001102 has a value of 12.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111001102 has a value of 12.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001201

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001201

11.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001201 has a value of 11.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001201 has a value of 11.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111001201 has a value of 11.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001202

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001202

10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001202 has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001202 has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111001202 has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001204

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001204

11.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001204 has a value of 11.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001204 has a value of 11.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111001204 has a value of 11.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001206

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001206

11.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001206 has a value of 11.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001206 has a value of 11.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 06111001206 has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001301

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001301

8.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001301 has a value of 8.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001301 has a value of 8.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 06111001301 has a value of 8.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001302

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001302

13.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001302 has a value of 13.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001302 has a value of 13.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111001302 has a value of 13.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001303

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001303

10.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001303 has a value of 10.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001303 has a value of 10.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111001303 has a value of 10.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001304

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001304

8.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001304 has a value of 8.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001304 has a value of 8.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111001304 has a value of 8.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001401

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001401

10.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001401 has a value of 10.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001401 has a value of 10.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111001401 has a value of 10.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001402

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001402

10.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001402 has a value of 10.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001402 has a value of 10.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111001402 has a value of 10.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001502

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001502

9.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001502 has a value of 9.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001502 has a value of 9.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 06111001502 has a value of 9.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001503

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001503

8.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001503 has a value of 8.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001503 has a value of 8.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 06111001503 has a value of 8.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001506

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001506

11.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001506 has a value of 11.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001506 has a value of 11.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111001506 has a value of 11.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001507

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001507

10.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001507 has a value of 10.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001507 has a value of 10.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111001507 has a value of 10.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001508

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001508

10.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001508 has a value of 10.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001508 has a value of 10.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111001508 has a value of 10.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001509

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001509

12.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001509 has a value of 12.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001509 has a value of 12.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111001509 has a value of 12.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001510

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001510

11.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001510 has a value of 11.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001510 has a value of 11.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111001510 has a value of 11.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001511

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001511

9.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001511 has a value of 9.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001511 has a value of 9.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111001511 has a value of 9.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001601

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001601

9.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001601 has a value of 9.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001601 has a value of 9.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 06111001601 has a value of 9.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001602

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001602

11.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001602 has a value of 11.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001602 has a value of 11.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111001602 has a value of 11.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001700

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001700

9.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001700 has a value of 9.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001700 has a value of 9.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 06111001700 has a value of 9.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001800

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001800

8.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001800 has a value of 8.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001800 has a value of 8.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 06111001800 has a value of 8.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001801

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001801

11.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001801 has a value of 11.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001801 has a value of 11.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111001801 has a value of 11.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001900

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001900

10.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001900 has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001900 has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 06111001900 has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001901

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111001901

10.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001901 has a value of 10.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001901 has a value of 10.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111001901 has a value of 10.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111002000

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111002000

9.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002000 has a value of 9.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002000 has a value of 9.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111002000 has a value of 9.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111002102

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111002102

9.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002102 has a value of 9.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002102 has a value of 9.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111002102 has a value of 9.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111002200

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111002200

11.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002200 has a value of 11.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002200 has a value of 11.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111002200 has a value of 11.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111002300

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111002300

9.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002300 has a value of 9.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002300 has a value of 9.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 06111002300 has a value of 9.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111002301

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111002301

11.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002301 has a value of 11.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002301 has a value of 11.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111002301 has a value of 11.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111002302

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111002302

13.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002302 has a value of 13.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002302 has a value of 13.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111002302 has a value of 13.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111002400

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111002400

12.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002400 has a value of 12.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002400 has a value of 12.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111002400 has a value of 12.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111002500

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111002500

10.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002500 has a value of 10.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002500 has a value of 10.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111002500 has a value of 10.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111002600

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111002600

9.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002600 has a value of 9.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002600 has a value of 9.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111002600 has a value of 9.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111002700

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111002700

11.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002700 has a value of 11.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002700 has a value of 11.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111002700 has a value of 11.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111002800

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111002800

11.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002800 has a value of 11.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002800 has a value of 11.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111002800 has a value of 11.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111002901

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111002901

14.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002901 has a value of 14.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002901 has a value of 14.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111002901 has a value of 14.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111002905

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111002905

12.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002905 has a value of 12.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002905 has a value of 12.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111002905 has a value of 12.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111003010

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111003010

11.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003010 has a value of 11.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003010 has a value of 11.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111003010 has a value of 11.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111003011

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111003011

14.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003011 has a value of 14.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003011 has a value of 14.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111003011 has a value of 14.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111003012

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111003012

23.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003012 has a value of 23.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003012 has a value of 23.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 06111003012 has a value of 23.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111003013

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111003013

11.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003013 has a value of 11.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003013 has a value of 11.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111003013 has a value of 11.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111003100

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111003100

8.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003100 has a value of 8.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003100 has a value of 8.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 06111003100 has a value of 8.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111003101

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111003101

11.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003101 has a value of 11.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003101 has a value of 11.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111003101 has a value of 11.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111003102

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111003102

11.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003102 has a value of 11.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003102 has a value of 11.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111003102 has a value of 11.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111003201

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111003201

14.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003201 has a value of 14.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003201 has a value of 14.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111003201 has a value of 14.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111003300

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111003300

12.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003300 has a value of 12.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003300 has a value of 12.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 06111003300 has a value of 12.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111003301

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111003301

13.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003301 has a value of 13.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003301 has a value of 13.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111003301 has a value of 13.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111003302

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111003302

11.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003302 has a value of 11.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003302 has a value of 11.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111003302 has a value of 11.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111003605

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111003605

9.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003605 has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003605 has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 06111003605 has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111003608

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111003608

11.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003608 has a value of 11.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003608 has a value of 11.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), 06111003608 has a value of 11.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111003609

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06111003609

10.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003609 has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003609 has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 06111003609 has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.