Home > Community Dashboard > Prevention of Chronic Conditions by Promoting Healthy Lifestyles
Search for Indicators

Prevention of Chronic Conditions by Promoting Healthy Lifestyles

This is a priority based on the 2022-2024 Community Health Needs Assessment, which includes:
  • Cancer
  • Diabetes
  • Heart Disease and Stroke
  • Nutrition and Healthy Eating
  • Physical Activity
  • Weight Status
Turn Colorblind Mode On See the Legend

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

green chart bars Significantly better than the overall value

red chart bars Significantly worse than the overall value

dark blue chart bars Significantly different than the overall value

light blue chart bars No significant difference with the overall value

gray chart bars No data on significance available

More

Health / Weight Status

Health / Weight Status

Health / Weight Status

Adults Who Are Obese

Value
Compared to:

Health / Weight Status

Adults Who Are Obese

Value
Compared to:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Place (City): Simi Valley

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Simi Valley

27.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Simi Valley has a value of 27.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
CA Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Simi Valley has a value of 27.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.2%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), Simi Valley has a value of 27.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Place (City): Thousand Oaks

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Thousand Oaks

26.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Thousand Oaks has a value of 26.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
CA Census Places
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Thousand Oaks has a value of 26.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.2%.
U.S. Census Places
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), Thousand Oaks has a value of 26.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 91320

Current Value:

Zip Code: 91320

23.1%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (28.8%), 91320 has a value of 23.1% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(28.8%)
Compared to the prior value, 91320 (23.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (18.4%).
Prior Value
(18.4%)
Over time, the 91320 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 91360

Current Value:

Zip Code: 91360

24.8%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (28.8%), 91360 has a value of 24.8% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(28.8%)
Compared to the prior value, 91360 (24.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (20.1%).
Prior Value
(20.1%)
Over time, the 91360 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 91361

Current Value:

Zip Code: 91361

19.1%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (28.8%), 91361 has a value of 19.1% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(28.8%)
Compared to the prior value, 91361 (19.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (16.2%).
Prior Value
(16.2%)
Over time, the 91361 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 91362

Current Value:

Zip Code: 91362

21.4%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (28.8%), 91362 has a value of 21.4% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(28.8%)
Compared to the prior value, 91362 (21.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (17.4%).
Prior Value
(17.4%)
Over time, the 91362 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 91377

Current Value:

Zip Code: 91377

19.1%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (28.8%), 91377 has a value of 19.1% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(28.8%)
Compared to the prior value, 91377 (19.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (16.2%).
Prior Value
(16.2%)
Over time, the 91377 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 93001

Current Value:

Zip Code: 93001

27.5%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (28.8%), 93001 has a value of 27.5% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(28.8%)
Compared to the prior value, 93001 (27.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (27.3%).
Prior Value
(27.3%)
Over time, the 93001 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 93003

Current Value:

Zip Code: 93003

27.4%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (28.8%), 93003 has a value of 27.4% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(28.8%)
Compared to the prior value, 93003 (27.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (23.1%).
Prior Value
(23.1%)
Over time, the 93003 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 93004

Current Value:

Zip Code: 93004

29.2%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (28.8%), 93004 has a value of 29.2% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(28.8%)
Compared to the prior value, 93004 (29.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (23.4%).
Prior Value
(23.4%)
Over time, the 93004 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 93010

Current Value:

Zip Code: 93010

27.5%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (28.8%), 93010 has a value of 27.5% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(28.8%)
Compared to the prior value, 93010 (27.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (21.4%).
Prior Value
(21.4%)
Over time, the 93010 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 93012

Current Value:

Zip Code: 93012

22.6%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (28.8%), 93012 has a value of 22.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(28.8%)
Compared to the prior value, 93012 (22.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (18.5%).
Prior Value
(18.5%)
Over time, the 93012 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 93015

Current Value:

Zip Code: 93015

34.4%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (28.8%), 93015 has a value of 34.4% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(28.8%)
Compared to the prior value, 93015 (34.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (29.7%).
Prior Value
(29.7%)
Over time, the 93015 value is staying the same.
Trend
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 93021

Current Value:

Zip Code: 93021

26.8%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (28.8%), 93021 has a value of 26.8% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(28.8%)
Compared to the prior value, 93021 (26.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (20.5%).
Prior Value
(20.5%)
Over time, the 93021 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 93022

Current Value:

Zip Code: 93022

25.3%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (28.8%), 93022 has a value of 25.3% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(28.8%)
Compared to the prior value, 93022 (25.3%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (23.7%).
Prior Value
(23.7%)
Over time, the 93022 value is staying the same.
Trend
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 93023

Current Value:

Zip Code: 93023

25.4%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (28.8%), 93023 has a value of 25.4% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(28.8%)
Compared to the prior value, 93023 (25.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (22.0%).
Prior Value
(22.0%)
Over time, the 93023 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 93030

Current Value:

Zip Code: 93030

37.2%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (28.8%), 93030 has a value of 37.2% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(28.8%)
Compared to the prior value, 93030 (37.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (29.9%).
Prior Value
(29.9%)
Over time, the 93030 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 93033

Current Value:

Zip Code: 93033

36.4%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (28.8%), 93033 has a value of 36.4% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(28.8%)
Compared to the prior value, 93033 (36.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (30.5%).
Prior Value
(30.5%)
Over time, the 93033 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 93035

Current Value:

Zip Code: 93035

29.7%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (28.8%), 93035 has a value of 29.7% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(28.8%)
Compared to the prior value, 93035 (29.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (24.1%).
Prior Value
(24.1%)
Over time, the 93035 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 93036

Current Value:

Zip Code: 93036

34.7%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (28.8%), 93036 has a value of 34.7% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(28.8%)
Compared to the prior value, 93036 (34.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (30.4%).
Prior Value
(30.4%)
Over time, the 93036 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 93040

Current Value:

Zip Code: 93040

34.2%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (28.8%), 93040 has a value of 34.2% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(28.8%)
Compared to the prior value, 93040 (34.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (31.0%).
Prior Value
(31.0%)
Over time, the 93040 value is staying the same.
Trend
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 93041

Current Value:

Zip Code: 93041

35.6%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (28.8%), 93041 has a value of 35.6% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(28.8%)
Compared to the prior value, 93041 (35.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (25.9%).
Prior Value
(25.9%)
Over time, the 93041 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 93042

Current Value:

Zip Code: 93042

19.9%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (28.8%), 93042 has a value of 19.9% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(28.8%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 93043

Current Value:

Zip Code: 93043

17.2%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (24.0%), 93043 has a value of 17.2% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(24.0%)
Compared to the prior value, 93043 (17.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.7%).
Prior Value
(17.7%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 93060

Current Value:

Zip Code: 93060

35.1%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (28.8%), 93060 has a value of 35.1% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(28.8%)
Compared to the prior value, 93060 (35.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (33.5%).
Prior Value
(33.5%)
Over time, the 93060 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 93063

Current Value:

Zip Code: 93063

28.4%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (28.8%), 93063 has a value of 28.4% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(28.8%)
Compared to the prior value, 93063 (28.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (22.0%).
Prior Value
(22.0%)
Over time, the 93063 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 93064

Current Value:

Zip Code: 93064

25.7%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (28.8%), 93064 has a value of 25.7% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(28.8%)
Compared to the prior value, 93064 (25.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (18.6%).
Prior Value
(18.6%)
Over time, the 93064 value is staying the same.
Trend
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 93065

Current Value:

Zip Code: 93065

28.2%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (28.8%), 93065 has a value of 28.2% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(28.8%)
Compared to the prior value, 93065 (28.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (21.6%).
Prior Value
(21.6%)
Over time, the 93065 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Zip Code: 93066

Current Value:

Zip Code: 93066

26.9%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (28.8%), 93066 has a value of 26.9% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(28.8%)
Compared to the prior value, 93066 (26.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (25.5%).
Prior Value
(25.5%)
Over time, the 93066 value is staying the same.
Trend
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000100

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111000100

27.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000100 has a value of 27.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000100 has a value of 27.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111000100 has a value of 27.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000200

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111000200

32.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000200 has a value of 32.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000200 has a value of 32.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111000200 has a value of 32.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000302

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111000302

32.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000302 has a value of 32.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000302 has a value of 32.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111000302 has a value of 32.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000303

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111000303

30.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000303 has a value of 30.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000303 has a value of 30.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111000303 has a value of 30.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000304

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111000304

34.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000304 has a value of 34.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000304 has a value of 34.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111000304 has a value of 34.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000400

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111000400

34.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000400 has a value of 34.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000400 has a value of 34.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111000400 has a value of 34.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000500

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111000500

31.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000500 has a value of 31.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000500 has a value of 31.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111000500 has a value of 31.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000600

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111000600

35.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000600 has a value of 35.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000600 has a value of 35.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111000600 has a value of 35.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000701

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111000701

36.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000701 has a value of 36.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000701 has a value of 36.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111000701 has a value of 36.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000702

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111000702

32.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000702 has a value of 32.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000702 has a value of 32.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111000702 has a value of 32.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000800

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111000800

30.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000800 has a value of 30.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000800 has a value of 30.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111000800 has a value of 30.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000901

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111000901

26.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000901 has a value of 26.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000901 has a value of 26.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111000901 has a value of 26.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000902

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111000902

29.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000902 has a value of 29.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000902 has a value of 29.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111000902 has a value of 29.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111000903

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111000903

28.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000903 has a value of 28.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000903 has a value of 28.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111000903 has a value of 28.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001001

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111001001

27.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001001 has a value of 27.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001001 has a value of 27.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001001 has a value of 27.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001002

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111001002

29.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001002 has a value of 29.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001002 has a value of 29.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111001002 has a value of 29.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001101

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111001101

28.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001101 has a value of 28.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001101 has a value of 28.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111001101 has a value of 28.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001102

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111001102

29.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001102 has a value of 29.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001102 has a value of 29.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111001102 has a value of 29.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001201

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111001201

29.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001201 has a value of 29.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001201 has a value of 29.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111001201 has a value of 29.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001202

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111001202

26.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001202 has a value of 26.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001202 has a value of 26.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111001202 has a value of 26.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001204

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111001204

31.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001204 has a value of 31.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001204 has a value of 31.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111001204 has a value of 31.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001206

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111001206

26.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001206 has a value of 26.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001206 has a value of 26.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001206 has a value of 26.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001301

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111001301

27.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001301 has a value of 27.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001301 has a value of 27.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001301 has a value of 27.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001302

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111001302

30.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001302 has a value of 30.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001302 has a value of 30.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111001302 has a value of 30.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001303

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111001303

29.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001303 has a value of 29.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001303 has a value of 29.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111001303 has a value of 29.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001304

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111001304

27.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001304 has a value of 27.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001304 has a value of 27.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111001304 has a value of 27.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001401

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111001401

28.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001401 has a value of 28.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001401 has a value of 28.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111001401 has a value of 28.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001402

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111001402

28.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001402 has a value of 28.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001402 has a value of 28.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111001402 has a value of 28.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001502

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111001502

27.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001502 has a value of 27.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001502 has a value of 27.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001502 has a value of 27.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001503

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111001503

28.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001503 has a value of 28.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001503 has a value of 28.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001503 has a value of 28.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001506

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111001506

29.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001506 has a value of 29.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001506 has a value of 29.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111001506 has a value of 29.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001507

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111001507

29.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001507 has a value of 29.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001507 has a value of 29.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111001507 has a value of 29.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001508

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111001508

28.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001508 has a value of 28.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001508 has a value of 28.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111001508 has a value of 28.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001509

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111001509

30.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001509 has a value of 30.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001509 has a value of 30.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111001509 has a value of 30.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001510

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111001510

31.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001510 has a value of 31.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001510 has a value of 31.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111001510 has a value of 31.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001511

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111001511

29.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001511 has a value of 29.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001511 has a value of 29.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111001511 has a value of 29.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001601

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111001601

27.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001601 has a value of 27.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001601 has a value of 27.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001601 has a value of 27.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001602

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111001602

28.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001602 has a value of 28.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001602 has a value of 28.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111001602 has a value of 28.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001700

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111001700

23.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001700 has a value of 23.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001700 has a value of 23.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001700 has a value of 23.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001800

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111001800

23.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001800 has a value of 23.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001800 has a value of 23.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001800 has a value of 23.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001801

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111001801

26.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001801 has a value of 26.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001801 has a value of 26.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111001801 has a value of 26.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001900

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111001900

27.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001900 has a value of 27.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001900 has a value of 27.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111001900 has a value of 27.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111001901

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111001901

28.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001901 has a value of 28.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001901 has a value of 28.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111001901 has a value of 28.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002000

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111002000

25.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002000 has a value of 25.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002000 has a value of 25.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111002000 has a value of 25.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002102

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111002102

27.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002102 has a value of 27.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002102 has a value of 27.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111002102 has a value of 27.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002200

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111002200

32.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002200 has a value of 32.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002200 has a value of 32.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111002200 has a value of 32.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002300

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111002300

30.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002300 has a value of 30.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002300 has a value of 30.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111002300 has a value of 30.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002301

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111002301

33.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002301 has a value of 33.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002301 has a value of 33.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111002301 has a value of 33.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002302

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111002302

36.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002302 has a value of 36.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002302 has a value of 36.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111002302 has a value of 36.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002400

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111002400

33.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002400 has a value of 33.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002400 has a value of 33.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111002400 has a value of 33.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002500

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111002500

26.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002500 has a value of 26.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002500 has a value of 26.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111002500 has a value of 26.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002600

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111002600

29.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002600 has a value of 29.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002600 has a value of 29.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111002600 has a value of 29.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002700

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111002700

28.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002700 has a value of 28.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002700 has a value of 28.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111002700 has a value of 28.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002800

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111002800

31.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002800 has a value of 31.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002800 has a value of 31.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111002800 has a value of 31.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002901

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111002901

29.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002901 has a value of 29.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002901 has a value of 29.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111002901 has a value of 29.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111002905

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111002905

28.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002905 has a value of 28.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002905 has a value of 28.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111002905 has a value of 28.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003010

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111003010

31.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003010 has a value of 31.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003010 has a value of 31.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111003010 has a value of 31.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003011

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111003011

34.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003011 has a value of 34.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003011 has a value of 34.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111003011 has a value of 34.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003012

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111003012

41.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003012 has a value of 41.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003012 has a value of 41.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111003012 has a value of 41.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.0%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003013

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111003013

31.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003013 has a value of 31.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003013 has a value of 31.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111003013 has a value of 31.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003100

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111003100

25.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003100 has a value of 25.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003100 has a value of 25.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111003100 has a value of 25.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003101

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111003101

29.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003101 has a value of 29.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003101 has a value of 29.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111003101 has a value of 29.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003102

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111003102

26.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003102 has a value of 26.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003102 has a value of 26.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111003102 has a value of 26.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003201

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111003201

37.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003201 has a value of 37.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003201 has a value of 37.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111003201 has a value of 37.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003300

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111003300

31.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003300 has a value of 31.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003300 has a value of 31.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111003300 has a value of 31.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003301

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111003301

34.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003301 has a value of 34.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003301 has a value of 34.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111003301 has a value of 34.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003302

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111003302

31.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003302 has a value of 31.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003302 has a value of 31.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111003302 has a value of 31.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003605

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111003605

26.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003605 has a value of 26.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003605 has a value of 26.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111003605 has a value of 26.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003608

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111003608

30.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003608 has a value of 30.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003608 has a value of 30.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111003608 has a value of 30.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003609

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111003609

25.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003609 has a value of 25.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003609 has a value of 25.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111003609 has a value of 25.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003612

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111003612

25.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003612 has a value of 25.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003612 has a value of 25.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111003612 has a value of 25.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003613

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111003613

27.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003613 has a value of 27.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003613 has a value of 27.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111003613 has a value of 27.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003614

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111003614

28.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003614 has a value of 28.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003614 has a value of 28.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111003614 has a value of 28.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003615

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111003615

28.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003615 has a value of 28.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003615 has a value of 28.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111003615 has a value of 28.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003616

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111003616

25.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003616 has a value of 25.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003616 has a value of 25.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111003616 has a value of 25.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003617

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111003617

28.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003617 has a value of 28.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003617 has a value of 28.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111003617 has a value of 28.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003618

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111003618

28.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003618 has a value of 28.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003618 has a value of 28.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111003618 has a value of 28.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003700

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111003700

34.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003700 has a value of 34.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003700 has a value of 34.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111003700 has a value of 34.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003801

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111003801

38.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003801 has a value of 38.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003801 has a value of 38.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111003801 has a value of 38.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003802

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111003802

34.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003802 has a value of 34.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003802 has a value of 34.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111003802 has a value of 34.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003900

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111003900

31.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003900 has a value of 31.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003900 has a value of 31.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111003900 has a value of 31.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003901

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111003901

34.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003901 has a value of 34.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003901 has a value of 34.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111003901 has a value of 34.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111003902

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111003902

33.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003902 has a value of 33.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003902 has a value of 33.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111003902 has a value of 33.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004000

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111004000

33.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004000 has a value of 33.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004000 has a value of 33.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111004000 has a value of 33.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004101

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111004101

32.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004101 has a value of 32.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004101 has a value of 32.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111004101 has a value of 32.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004200

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111004200

32.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004200 has a value of 32.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004200 has a value of 32.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111004200 has a value of 32.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004304

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111004304

31.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004304 has a value of 31.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004304 has a value of 31.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111004304 has a value of 31.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004305

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111004305

27.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004305 has a value of 27.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004305 has a value of 27.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111004305 has a value of 27.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004400

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111004400

31.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004400 has a value of 31.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004400 has a value of 31.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111004400 has a value of 31.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004503

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111004503

31.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004503 has a value of 31.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004503 has a value of 31.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111004503 has a value of 31.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004504

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111004504

31.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004504 has a value of 31.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004504 has a value of 31.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111004504 has a value of 31.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004505

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111004505

34.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004505 has a value of 34.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004505 has a value of 34.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111004505 has a value of 34.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004506

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111004506

35.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004506 has a value of 35.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004506 has a value of 35.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111004506 has a value of 35.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.0%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004507

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111004507

35.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004507 has a value of 35.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004507 has a value of 35.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111004507 has a value of 35.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004508

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111004508

37.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004508 has a value of 37.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004508 has a value of 37.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111004508 has a value of 37.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004600

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111004600

29.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004600 has a value of 29.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004600 has a value of 29.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111004600 has a value of 29.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004704

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111004704

37.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004704 has a value of 37.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004704 has a value of 37.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111004704 has a value of 37.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004710

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111004710

30.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004710 has a value of 30.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004710 has a value of 30.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111004710 has a value of 30.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004711

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111004711

25.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004711 has a value of 25.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004711 has a value of 25.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111004711 has a value of 25.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004715

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111004715

32.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004715 has a value of 32.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004715 has a value of 32.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111004715 has a value of 32.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004716

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111004716

33.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004716 has a value of 33.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004716 has a value of 33.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111004716 has a value of 33.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004717

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111004717

32.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004717 has a value of 32.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004717 has a value of 32.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111004717 has a value of 32.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004901

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111004901

27.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004901 has a value of 27.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004901 has a value of 27.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111004901 has a value of 27.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111004902

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111004902

34.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004902 has a value of 34.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004902 has a value of 34.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111004902 has a value of 34.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005002

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111005002

36.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005002 has a value of 36.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005002 has a value of 36.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111005002 has a value of 36.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005003

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111005003

31.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005003 has a value of 31.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005003 has a value of 31.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005003 has a value of 31.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005004

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111005004

28.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005004 has a value of 28.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005004 has a value of 28.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111005004 has a value of 28.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005005

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111005005

36.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005005 has a value of 36.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005005 has a value of 36.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111005005 has a value of 36.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005006

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111005006

31.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005006 has a value of 31.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005006 has a value of 31.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111005006 has a value of 31.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005100

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111005100

27.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005100 has a value of 27.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005100 has a value of 27.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005100 has a value of 27.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005202

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111005202

26.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005202 has a value of 26.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005202 has a value of 26.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111005202 has a value of 26.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005203

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111005203

26.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005203 has a value of 26.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005203 has a value of 26.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111005203 has a value of 26.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005204

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111005204

24.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005204 has a value of 24.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005204 has a value of 24.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111005204 has a value of 24.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005205

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111005205

26.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005205 has a value of 26.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005205 has a value of 26.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111005205 has a value of 26.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005303

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111005303

23.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005303 has a value of 23.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005303 has a value of 23.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), 06111005303 has a value of 23.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005304

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111005304

25.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005304 has a value of 25.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005304 has a value of 25.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111005304 has a value of 25.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005305

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111005305

24.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005305 has a value of 24.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005305 has a value of 24.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111005305 has a value of 24.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005306

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111005306

25.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005306 has a value of 25.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005306 has a value of 25.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111005306 has a value of 25.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005307

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111005307

24.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005307 has a value of 24.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005307 has a value of 24.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111005307 has a value of 24.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005308

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111005308

26.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005308 has a value of 26.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005308 has a value of 26.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111005308 has a value of 26.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults Who Are Obese Census Tract: 06111005401

Current Value:

Census Tract: 06111005401

28.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005401 has a value of 28.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Tracts
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005401 has a value of 28.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), 06111005401 has a value of 28.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.3%)
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (21.6%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(21.6%)
Learn More
Save Card