Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Addressing Mental Health and Substance Use Across the Lifespan

This is a priority based on the 2022-2024 Community Health Needs Assessment, which includes:
  1. Adverse Childhood Experiences
    1. Substance Use
    2. Adolescent Health
    3. Education
    4. Housing Overcrowding
  2. Health and Wellness for Older Adults

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

green chart bars Significantly better than the overall value

red chart bars Significantly worse than the overall value

dark blue chart bars Significantly different than the overall value

light blue chart bars No significant difference with the overall value

gray chart bars No data on significance available

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Older Adults

Health / Older Adults

Health / Older Adults

People 65+ Living Alone (Count)

Value
Compared to:

Health / Older Adults

People 65+ Living Alone (Count)

Value
Compared to:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111001201

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111001201

224
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111001201 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111001202

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111001202

126
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111001202 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111001204

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111001204

47
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111001204 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111001302

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111001302

357
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111001302 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111001401

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111001401

177
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111001401 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111001402

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111001402

148
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111001402 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111001506

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111001506

233
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111001506 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111001507

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111001507

131
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111001507 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111001602

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111001602

164
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111001602 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111002000

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111002000

146
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111002000 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111002102

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111002102

147
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111002102 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111002200

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111002200

115
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111002200 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111002400

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111002400

219
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111002400 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111002500

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111002500

482
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111002500 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111002600

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111002600

164
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111002600 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111002700

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111002700

430
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111002700 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111002800

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111002800

219
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111002800 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111002901

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111002901

130
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111002901 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111002905

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111002905

41
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111002905 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111003010

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111003010

58
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111003010 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111003011

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111003011

40
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111003011 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111003013

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111003013

57
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111003013 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111003201

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111003201

30
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111003201 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111003608

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111003608

16
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111003608 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111003700

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111003700

33
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111003700 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111003801

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111003801

30
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111003801 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111003802

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111003802

22
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111003802 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111004000

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111004000

86
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111004000 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111004101

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111004101

31
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111004101 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111004200

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111004200

137
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111004200 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111004304

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111004304

395
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111004304 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111004400

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111004400

273
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111004400 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111004503

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111004503

58
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111004503 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111004504

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111004504

61
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111004504 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111004505

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111004505

4
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111004505 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111004600

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111004600

0
People
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111004600 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111004704

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111004704

29
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111004704 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111004710

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111004710

147
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111004710 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111004711

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111004711

23
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111004711 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111004715

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111004715

51
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111004715 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111004716

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111004716

49
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111004716 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111004717

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111004717

12
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111004717 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111004901

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111004901

6
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111004901 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111004902

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111004902

73
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111004902 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005002

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005002

39
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005002 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005004

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005004

80
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005004 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005202

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005202

166
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005202 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005203

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005203

222
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005203 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005204

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005204

156
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005204 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005205

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005205

348
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005205 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005304

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005304

1,031
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005304 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005305

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005305

92
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005305 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005306

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005306

95
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005306 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005401

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005401

40
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005401 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005403

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005403

258
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005403 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005404

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005404

148
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005404 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005502

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005502

223
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005502 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005503

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005503

234
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005503 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005504

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005504

193
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005504 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005700

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005700

8
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005700 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005801

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005801

95
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005801 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005901

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005901

298
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005901 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005906

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005906

230
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005906 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005907

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005907

349
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005907 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005908

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005908

46
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005908 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005909

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005909

264
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005909 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005910

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005910

5
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005910 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005911

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111005911

289
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005911 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111006000

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111006000

106
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111006000 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111006200

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111006200

114
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111006200 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111006301

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111006301

708
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111006301 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111006302

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111006302

53
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111006302 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111006400

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111006400

361
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111006400 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111006500

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111006500

18
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111006500 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111006600

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111006600

75
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111006600 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111006700

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111006700

88
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111006700 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111006800

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111006800

66
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111006800 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111006900

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111006900

351
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111006900 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007000

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007000

303
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007000 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007100

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007100

687
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007100 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007201

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007201

70
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007201 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007202

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007202

182
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007202 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007300

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007300

60
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007300 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007402

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007402

246
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007402 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007403

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007403

181
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007403 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007405

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007405

276
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007405 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007406

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007406

57
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007406 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007505

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007505

191
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007505 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007506

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007506

184
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007506 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007507

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007507

209
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007507 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007508

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007508

162
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007508 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007509

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007509

142
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007509 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007510

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007510

44
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007510 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007511

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007511

35
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007511 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007512

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007512

97
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007512 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007513

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007513

32
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007513 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007607

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007607

165
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007607 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007609

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007609

30
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007609 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007610

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007610

96
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007610 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007611

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007611

25
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007611 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007612

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007612

147
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007612 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007613

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007613

102
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007613 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007614

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007614

164
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007614 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007700

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007700

215
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007700 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007800

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007800

198
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007800 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007901

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007901

257
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007901 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007903

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007903

135
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007903 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007904

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111007904

184
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007904 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111008001

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111008001

94
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111008001 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111008002

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111008002

140
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111008002 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111008004

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111008004

94
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111008004 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111008005

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111008005

76
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111008005 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111008101

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111008101

112
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111008101 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111008201

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111008201

274
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111008201 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111008202

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111008202

84
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111008202 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111008302

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111008302

346
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111008302 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111008303

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111008303

269
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111008303 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111008304

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111008304

332
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111008304 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111008401

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111008401

310
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111008401 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111008402

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111008402

86
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111008402 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111008700

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111008700

186
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111008700 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111008800

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111008800

47
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111008800 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111008900

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111008900

16
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111008900 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111009100

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) Census Tract: 06111009100

44
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111009100 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Older Adults

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Health / Older Adults

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level County: Ventura

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level County: Ventura

8.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Ventura has a value of 8.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ventura has a value of 8.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Ventura has a value of 8.4% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Ventura has a value of 8.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Ventura value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Bell Canyon

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Bell Canyon

10.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Bell Canyon has a value of 10.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Bell Canyon has a value of 10.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (8.4%), Bell Canyon has a value of 10.8% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(8.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Bell Canyon has a value of 10.8% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Bell Canyon has a value of 10.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bell Canyon value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Camarillo

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Camarillo

8.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Camarillo has a value of 8.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Camarillo has a value of 8.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (8.4%), Camarillo has a value of 8.7% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(8.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Camarillo has a value of 8.7% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Camarillo has a value of 8.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Camarillo value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Casa Conejo

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Casa Conejo

8.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Casa Conejo has a value of 8.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Casa Conejo has a value of 8.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (8.4%), Casa Conejo has a value of 8.5% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(8.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Casa Conejo has a value of 8.5% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Casa Conejo has a value of 8.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Casa Conejo value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Channel Islands Beach

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Channel Islands Beach

9.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Channel Islands Beach has a value of 9.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Channel Islands Beach has a value of 9.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (8.4%), Channel Islands Beach has a value of 9.8% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(8.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Channel Islands Beach has a value of 9.8% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Channel Islands Beach has a value of 9.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Channel Islands Beach value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): El Rio

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): El Rio

6.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, El Rio has a value of 6.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, El Rio has a value of 6.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (8.4%), El Rio has a value of 6.2% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(8.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), El Rio has a value of 6.2% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), El Rio has a value of 6.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the El Rio value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Fillmore

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Fillmore

5.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Fillmore has a value of 5.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Fillmore has a value of 5.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (8.4%), Fillmore has a value of 5.7% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(8.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Fillmore has a value of 5.7% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Fillmore has a value of 5.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Fillmore value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Lake Sherwood

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Lake Sherwood

5.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Lake Sherwood has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Lake Sherwood has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (8.4%), Lake Sherwood has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(8.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Lake Sherwood has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Lake Sherwood has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lake Sherwood value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Meiners Oaks

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Meiners Oaks

1.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Meiners Oaks has a value of 1.9% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Meiners Oaks has a value of 1.9% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (8.4%), Meiners Oaks has a value of 1.9% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(8.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Meiners Oaks has a value of 1.9% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Meiners Oaks has a value of 1.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Meiners Oaks value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Mira Monte

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Mira Monte

14.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Mira Monte has a value of 14.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Mira Monte has a value of 14.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (8.4%), Mira Monte has a value of 14.6% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(8.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Mira Monte has a value of 14.6% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Mira Monte has a value of 14.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mira Monte value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Moorpark

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Moorpark

3.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Moorpark has a value of 3.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Moorpark has a value of 3.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (8.4%), Moorpark has a value of 3.2% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(8.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Moorpark has a value of 3.2% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Moorpark has a value of 3.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Moorpark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Oak Park

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Oak Park

12.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Oak Park has a value of 12.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Oak Park has a value of 12.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (8.4%), Oak Park has a value of 12.7% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(8.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Oak Park has a value of 12.7% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Oak Park has a value of 12.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Oak Park value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Oak View

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Oak View

5.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Oak View has a value of 5.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Oak View has a value of 5.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (8.4%), Oak View has a value of 5.4% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(8.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Oak View has a value of 5.4% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Oak View has a value of 5.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Oak View value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Ojai

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Ojai

5.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Ojai has a value of 5.5% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Ojai has a value of 5.5% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (8.4%), Ojai has a value of 5.5% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(8.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Ojai has a value of 5.5% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Ojai has a value of 5.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Ojai value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Oxnard

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Oxnard

8.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Oxnard has a value of 8.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Oxnard has a value of 8.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (8.4%), Oxnard has a value of 8.2% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(8.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Oxnard has a value of 8.2% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Oxnard has a value of 8.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Oxnard value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Piru

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Piru

4.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Piru has a value of 4.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Piru has a value of 4.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (8.4%), Piru has a value of 4.1% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(8.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Piru has a value of 4.1% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Piru has a value of 4.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Piru value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Port Hueneme

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Port Hueneme

11.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Port Hueneme has a value of 11.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Port Hueneme has a value of 11.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (8.4%), Port Hueneme has a value of 11.1% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(8.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Port Hueneme has a value of 11.1% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Port Hueneme has a value of 11.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Port Hueneme value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): San Buenaventura (Ventura)

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): San Buenaventura (Ventura)

9.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, San Buenaventura (Ventura) has a value of 9.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, San Buenaventura (Ventura) has a value of 9.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (8.4%), San Buenaventura (Ventura) has a value of 9.0% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(8.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), San Buenaventura (Ventura) has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), San Buenaventura (Ventura) has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the San Buenaventura (Ventura) value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Santa Paula

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Santa Paula

13.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Santa Paula has a value of 13.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Santa Paula has a value of 13.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (8.4%), Santa Paula has a value of 13.4% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(8.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Santa Paula has a value of 13.4% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Santa Paula has a value of 13.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Santa Paula value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Santa Rosa Valley

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Santa Rosa Valley

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Santa Rosa Valley has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Santa Rosa Valley has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (8.4%), Santa Rosa Valley has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(8.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Santa Rosa Valley has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Santa Rosa Valley has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Santa Rosa Valley value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Santa Susana

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Santa Susana

17.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Santa Susana has a value of 17.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Santa Susana has a value of 17.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (8.4%), Santa Susana has a value of 17.1% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(8.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Santa Susana has a value of 17.1% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Santa Susana has a value of 17.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Santa Susana value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Saticoy

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Saticoy

4.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Saticoy has a value of 4.6% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Saticoy has a value of 4.6% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (8.4%), Saticoy has a value of 4.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(8.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Saticoy has a value of 4.6% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Saticoy has a value of 4.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Saticoy value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Simi Valley

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Simi Valley

7.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Simi Valley has a value of 7.9% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Simi Valley has a value of 7.9% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (8.4%), Simi Valley has a value of 7.9% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(8.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Simi Valley has a value of 7.9% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Simi Valley has a value of 7.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Simi Valley value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Thousand Oaks

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place (City): Thousand Oaks

8.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Thousand Oaks has a value of 8.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Thousand Oaks has a value of 8.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (8.4%), Thousand Oaks has a value of 8.8% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(8.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Thousand Oaks has a value of 8.8% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Thousand Oaks has a value of 8.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Thousand Oaks value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 91320

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 91320

5.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 91320 has a value of 5.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,697 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 91320 has a value of 5.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,127 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (8.4%), 91320 has a value of 5.5% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(8.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 91320 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 91360

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 91360

11.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 91360 has a value of 11.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,697 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 91360 has a value of 11.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,127 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (8.4%), 91360 has a value of 11.2% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(8.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 91360 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.