Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Addressing Mental Health and Substance Use Across the Lifespan

This is a priority based on the 2022-2024 Community Health Needs Assessment, which includes:
  1. Adverse Childhood Experiences
    1. Substance Use
    2. Adolescent Health
    3. Education
    4. Housing Overcrowding
  2. Health and Wellness for Older Adults

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

green chart bars Significantly better than the overall value

red chart bars Significantly worse than the overall value

dark blue chart bars Significantly different than the overall value

light blue chart bars No significant difference with the overall value

gray chart bars No data on significance available

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Older Adults

Health / Older Adults

Health / Older Adults

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count)

Value
Compared to:

Health / Older Adults

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count)

Value
Compared to:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111002901

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111002901

159
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111002901 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111002905

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111002905

16
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111002905 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111003010

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111003010

36
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111003010 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111003011

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111003011

214
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111003011 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111003013

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111003013

36
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111003013 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111003201

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111003201

83
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111003201 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111003608

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111003608

0
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111003608 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111003700

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111003700

20
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111003700 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111003801

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111003801

41
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111003801 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111003802

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111003802

5
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111003802 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111004000

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111004000

8
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111004000 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111004101

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111004101

68
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111004101 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111004200

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111004200

72
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111004200 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111004304

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111004304

110
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111004304 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111004400

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111004400

152
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111004400 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111004503

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111004503

26
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111004503 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111004504

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111004504

23
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111004504 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111004505

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111004505

0
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111004505 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111004600

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111004600

0
People
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111004600 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111004704

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111004704

8
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111004704 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111004710

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111004710

55
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111004710 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111004711

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111004711

49
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111004711 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111004715

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111004715

146
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111004715 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111004716

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111004716

8
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111004716 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111004717

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111004717

2
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111004717 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111004901

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111004901

30
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111004901 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111004902

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111004902

83
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111004902 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005002

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005002

56
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005002 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005004

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005004

35
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005004 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005202

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005202

19
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005202 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005203

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005203

37
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005203 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005204

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005204

82
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005204 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005205

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005205

184
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005205 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005304

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005304

345
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005304 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005305

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005305

56
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005305 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005306

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005306

51
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005306 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005401

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005401

45
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005401 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005403

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005403

47
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005403 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005404

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005404

25
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005404 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005502

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005502

97
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005502 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005503

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005503

53
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005503 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005504

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005504

118
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005504 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005700

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005700

0
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005700 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005801

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005801

0
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005801 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005901

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005901

82
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005901 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005906

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005906

54
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005906 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005907

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005907

99
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005907 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005908

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005908

35
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005908 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005909

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005909

107
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005909 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005910

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005910

5
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005910 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005911

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111005911

28
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111005911 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111006000

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111006000

27
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111006000 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111006200

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111006200

11
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111006200 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111006301

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111006301

214
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111006301 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111006302

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111006302

43
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111006302 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111006400

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111006400

49
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111006400 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111006500

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111006500

8
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111006500 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111006600

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111006600

47
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111006600 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111006700

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111006700

174
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111006700 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111006800

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111006800

63
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111006800 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111006900

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111006900

113
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111006900 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007000

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007000

256
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007000 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007100

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007100

384
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007100 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007201

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007201

16
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007201 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007202

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007202

8
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007202 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007300

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007300

24
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007300 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007402

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007402

102
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007402 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007403

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007403

156
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007403 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007405

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007405

95
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007405 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007406

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007406

22
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007406 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007505

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007505

87
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007505 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007506

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007506

20
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007506 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007507

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007507

26
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007507 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007508

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007508

61
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007508 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007509

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007509

84
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007509 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007510

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007510

0
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007510 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007511

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007511

40
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007511 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007512

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007512

76
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007512 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007513

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007513

16
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007513 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007607

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007607

13
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007607 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007609

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007609

4
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007609 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007610

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007610

22
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007610 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007611

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007611

6
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007611 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007612

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007612

24
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007612 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007613

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007613

47
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007613 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007614

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007614

69
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007614 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007700

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007700

75
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007700 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007800

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007800

149
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007800 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007901

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007901

42
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007901 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007903

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007903

137
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007903 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007904

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111007904

28
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111007904 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111008001

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111008001

52
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111008001 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111008002

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111008002

82
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111008002 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111008004

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111008004

14
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111008004 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111008005

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111008005

0
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111008005 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111008101

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111008101

103
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111008101 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111008201

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111008201

72
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111008201 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111008202

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111008202

51
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111008202 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111008302

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111008302

112
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111008302 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111008303

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111008303

34
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111008303 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111008304

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111008304

139
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111008304 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111008401

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111008401

81
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111008401 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111008402

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111008402

8
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111008402 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111008700

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111008700

156
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111008700 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111008800

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111008800

22
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111008800 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111008900

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111008900

13
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111008900 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111009100

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06111009100

67
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06111009100 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Older Adults

Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Health / Older Adults

Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate County: Ventura

Current Value:

Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate County: Ventura

121.1
Cases per 100,000 males
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Ventura has a value of 121.1 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 97.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 105.2.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 56 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ventura has a value of 121.1 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 110.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 127.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,728 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (98.6), Ventura has a value of 121.1 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(98.6)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (113.2), Ventura has a value of 121.1 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(113.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ventura (121.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (115.4).
Prior Value
(115.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ventura value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Health / Older Adults

Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Health / Older Adults

Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: Ventura

Current Value:

Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: Ventura

37.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Ventura has a value of 37.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 31.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ventura has a value of 37.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (32.0%), Ventura has a value of 37.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(32.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (35.0%), Ventura has a value of 37.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ventura (37.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (35.0%).
Prior Value
(35.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ventura value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Health / Older Adults

Stroke: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Health / Older Adults

Stroke: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Stroke: Medicare Population County: Ventura

Current Value:

Stroke: Medicare Population County: Ventura

6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Ventura has a value of 6.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ventura has a value of 6.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (5.0%), Ventura has a value of 6.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Ventura has a value of 6.0%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ventura (6.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ventura value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Economy / Housing & Homes

Economy / Housing & Homes

Economy / Housing & Homes

Homeowner Vacancy Rate

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

Homeowner Vacancy Rate

Value
Compared to:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate County: Ventura

Current Value:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate County: Ventura

0.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Ventura has a value of 0.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 0.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 30 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ventura has a value of 0.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.1%.
U.S. Counties
(2019)
The distribution is based on data from 511 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (0.7%), Ventura has a value of 0.2% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(0.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (0.8%), Ventura has a value of 0.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ventura (0.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.3%).
Prior Value
(0.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ventura value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place (City): Bell Canyon

Current Value:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place (City): Bell Canyon

7.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Bell Canyon has a value of 7.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.0%.
CA Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 1,470 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Bell Canyon has a value of 7.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 28,912 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (0.8%), Bell Canyon has a value of 7.2% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (0.9%), Bell Canyon has a value of 7.2% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(0.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Bell Canyon has a value of 7.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bell Canyon value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place (City): Camarillo

Current Value:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place (City): Camarillo

0.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Camarillo has a value of 0.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.0%.
CA Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 1,470 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Camarillo has a value of 0.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 28,912 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (0.8%), Camarillo has a value of 0.1% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (0.9%), Camarillo has a value of 0.1% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(0.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Camarillo has a value of 0.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Camarillo value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place (City): Casa Conejo

Current Value:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place (City): Casa Conejo

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Casa Conejo has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.0%.
CA Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 1,470 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Casa Conejo has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 28,912 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (0.8%), Casa Conejo has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (0.9%), Casa Conejo has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(0.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Casa Conejo has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Casa Conejo value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place (City): Channel Islands Beach

Current Value:
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Channel Islands Beach has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.0%.
CA Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 1,470 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Channel Islands Beach has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 28,912 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (0.8%), Channel Islands Beach has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (0.9%), Channel Islands Beach has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(0.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Channel Islands Beach has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Channel Islands Beach value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place (City): El Rio

Current Value:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place (City): El Rio

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, El Rio has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.0%.
CA Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 1,470 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, El Rio has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 28,912 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (0.8%), El Rio has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (0.9%), El Rio has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(0.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), El Rio has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the El Rio value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place (City): Fillmore

Current Value:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place (City): Fillmore

2.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Fillmore has a value of 2.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.0%.
CA Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 1,470 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Fillmore has a value of 2.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 28,912 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (0.8%), Fillmore has a value of 2.1% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (0.9%), Fillmore has a value of 2.1% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(0.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Fillmore has a value of 2.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Fillmore value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place (City): Lake Sherwood

Current Value:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place (City): Lake Sherwood

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Lake Sherwood has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.0%.
CA Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 1,470 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Lake Sherwood has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 28,912 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (0.8%), Lake Sherwood has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (0.9%), Lake Sherwood has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(0.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Lake Sherwood has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lake Sherwood value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place (City): Meiners Oaks

Current Value:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place (City): Meiners Oaks

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Meiners Oaks has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.0%.
CA Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 1,470 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Meiners Oaks has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 28,912 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (0.8%), Meiners Oaks has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (0.9%), Meiners Oaks has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(0.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Meiners Oaks has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Meiners Oaks value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place (City): Mira Monte

Current Value:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place (City): Mira Monte

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Mira Monte has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.0%.
CA Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 1,470 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Mira Monte has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 28,912 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (0.8%), Mira Monte has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (0.9%), Mira Monte has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(0.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Mira Monte has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mira Monte value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place (City): Moorpark

Current Value:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place (City): Moorpark

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Moorpark has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.0%.
CA Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 1,470 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Moorpark has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 28,912 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (0.8%), Moorpark has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (0.9%), Moorpark has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(0.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Moorpark has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Moorpark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place (City): Oak Park

Current Value:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place (City): Oak Park

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Oak Park has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.0%.
CA Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 1,470 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Oak Park has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 28,912 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (0.8%), Oak Park has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (0.9%), Oak Park has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(0.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Oak Park has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Oak Park value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place (City): Oak View

Current Value:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place (City): Oak View

0.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Oak View has a value of 0.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.0%.
CA Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 1,470 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Oak View has a value of 0.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 28,912 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (0.8%), Oak View has a value of 0.5% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (0.9%), Oak View has a value of 0.5% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(0.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Oak View has a value of 0.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Oak View value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place (City): Ojai

Current Value:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place (City): Ojai

6.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Ojai has a value of 6.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.0%.
CA Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 1,470 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Ojai has a value of 6.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 28,912 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (0.8%), Ojai has a value of 6.0% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (0.9%), Ojai has a value of 6.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(0.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Ojai has a value of 6.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Ojai value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place (City): Oxnard

Current Value:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place (City): Oxnard

1.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Oxnard has a value of 1.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.0%.
CA Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 1,470 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Oxnard has a value of 1.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 28,912 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (0.8%), Oxnard has a value of 1.5% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (0.9%), Oxnard has a value of 1.5% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(0.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Oxnard has a value of 1.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Oxnard value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place (City): Piru

Current Value:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place (City): Piru

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Piru has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.0%.
CA Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 1,470 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Piru has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 28,912 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (0.8%), Piru has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (0.9%), Piru has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(0.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Piru has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Piru value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place (City): Port Hueneme

Current Value:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place (City): Port Hueneme

1.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Port Hueneme has a value of 1.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.0%.
CA Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 1,470 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Port Hueneme has a value of 1.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 28,912 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (0.8%), Port Hueneme has a value of 1.1% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (0.9%), Port Hueneme has a value of 1.1% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(0.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Port Hueneme has a value of 1.1%.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Port Hueneme value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place (City): San Buenaventura (Ventura)

Current Value:
0.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, San Buenaventura (Ventura) has a value of 0.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.0%.
CA Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 1,470 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, San Buenaventura (Ventura) has a value of 0.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 28,912 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (0.8%), San Buenaventura (Ventura) has a value of 0.4% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (0.9%), San Buenaventura (Ventura) has a value of 0.4% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(0.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), San Buenaventura (Ventura) has a value of 0.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the San Buenaventura (Ventura) value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place (City): Santa Paula

Current Value:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place (City): Santa Paula

0.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Santa Paula has a value of 0.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.0%.
CA Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 1,470 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Santa Paula has a value of 0.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 28,912 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (0.8%), Santa Paula has a value of 0.9% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (0.9%), Santa Paula has a value of 0.9%.
CA Value
(0.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Santa Paula has a value of 0.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Santa Paula value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place (City): Santa Rosa Valley

Current Value:
5.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Santa Rosa Valley has a value of 5.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.0%.
CA Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 1,470 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Santa Rosa Valley has a value of 5.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 28,912 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (0.8%), Santa Rosa Valley has a value of 5.2% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (0.9%), Santa Rosa Valley has a value of 5.2% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(0.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Santa Rosa Valley has a value of 5.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Santa Rosa Valley value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place (City): Santa Susana

Current Value:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place (City): Santa Susana

6.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Santa Susana has a value of 6.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.0%.
CA Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 1,470 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Santa Susana has a value of 6.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 28,912 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (0.8%), Santa Susana has a value of 6.1% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (0.9%), Santa Susana has a value of 6.1% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(0.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Santa Susana has a value of 6.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Santa Susana value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place (City): Saticoy

Current Value:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place (City): Saticoy

5.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Saticoy has a value of 5.8% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.0%.
CA Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 1,470 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Saticoy has a value of 5.8% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 28,912 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (0.8%), Saticoy has a value of 5.8% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (0.9%), Saticoy has a value of 5.8% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(0.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Saticoy has a value of 5.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Saticoy value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place (City): Simi Valley

Current Value:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place (City): Simi Valley

0.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Simi Valley has a value of 0.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.0%.
CA Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 1,470 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Simi Valley has a value of 0.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 28,912 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (0.8%), Simi Valley has a value of 0.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (0.9%), Simi Valley has a value of 0.6% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(0.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Simi Valley has a value of 0.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Simi Valley value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place (City): Thousand Oaks

Current Value:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place (City): Thousand Oaks

0.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Thousand Oaks has a value of 0.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.0%.
CA Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 1,470 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Thousand Oaks has a value of 0.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 28,912 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (0.8%), Thousand Oaks has a value of 0.4% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (0.9%), Thousand Oaks has a value of 0.4% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(0.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Thousand Oaks has a value of 0.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Thousand Oaks value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Zip Code: 91320

Current Value:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Zip Code: 91320

0.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 91320 has a value of 0.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,702 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 91320 has a value of 0.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,408 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (0.8%), 91320 has a value of 0.3% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 91320 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Zip Code: 91360

Current Value:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Zip Code: 91360

0.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 91360 has a value of 0.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,702 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 91360 has a value of 0.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,408 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (0.8%), 91360 has a value of 0.5% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 91360 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Zip Code: 91361

Current Value:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Zip Code: 91361

0.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 91361 has a value of 0.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,702 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 91361 has a value of 0.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,408 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (0.8%), 91361 has a value of 0.3% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 91361 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Zip Code: 91362

Current Value:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Zip Code: 91362

0.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 91362 has a value of 0.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,702 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 91362 has a value of 0.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,408 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (0.8%), 91362 has a value of 0.5% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 91362 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Zip Code: 91377

Current Value:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Zip Code: 91377

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 91377 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,702 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 91377 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,408 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (0.8%), 91377 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 91377 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Zip Code: 93001

Current Value:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Zip Code: 93001

0.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93001 has a value of 0.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,702 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93001 has a value of 0.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,408 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (0.8%), 93001 has a value of 0.2% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93001 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Zip Code: 93003

Current Value:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Zip Code: 93003

0.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93003 has a value of 0.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,702 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93003 has a value of 0.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,408 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (0.8%), 93003 has a value of 0.7% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93003 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Zip Code: 93004

Current Value:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Zip Code: 93004

0.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93004 has a value of 0.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,702 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93004 has a value of 0.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,408 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (0.8%), 93004 has a value of 0.4% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93004 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Zip Code: 93010

Current Value:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Zip Code: 93010

0.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93010 has a value of 0.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,702 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93010 has a value of 0.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,408 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (0.8%), 93010 has a value of 0.5% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93010 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Zip Code: 93012

Current Value:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Zip Code: 93012

0.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93012 has a value of 0.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,702 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93012 has a value of 0.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,408 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (0.8%), 93012 has a value of 0.5% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93012 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Zip Code: 93015

Current Value:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Zip Code: 93015

1.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93015 has a value of 1.9% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,702 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93015 has a value of 1.9% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,408 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (0.8%), 93015 has a value of 1.9% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93015 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Zip Code: 93021

Current Value:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Zip Code: 93021

0.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93021 has a value of 0.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,702 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93021 has a value of 0.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,408 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (0.8%), 93021 has a value of 0.1% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93021 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Zip Code: 93022

Current Value:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Zip Code: 93022

0.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93022 has a value of 0.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,702 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93022 has a value of 0.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,408 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (0.8%), 93022 has a value of 0.5% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93022 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Zip Code: 93023

Current Value:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Zip Code: 93023

2.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93023 has a value of 2.6% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,702 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93023 has a value of 2.6% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,408 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (0.8%), 93023 has a value of 2.6% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93023 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Zip Code: 93030

Current Value:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Zip Code: 93030

0.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93030 has a value of 0.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,702 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93030 has a value of 0.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,408 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (0.8%), 93030 has a value of 0.3% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93030 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Zip Code: 93033

Current Value:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Zip Code: 93033

1.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93033 has a value of 1.9% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,702 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93033 has a value of 1.9% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,408 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (0.8%), 93033 has a value of 1.9% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93033 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.