Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Addressing Mental Health and Substance Use Across the Lifespan

This is a priority based on the 2022-2024 Community Health Needs Assessment, which includes:
  1. Adverse Childhood Experiences
    1. Substance Use
    2. Adolescent Health
    3. Education
    4. Housing Overcrowding
  2. Health and Wellness for Older Adults

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

green chart bars Significantly better than the overall value

red chart bars Significantly worse than the overall value

dark blue chart bars Significantly different than the overall value

light blue chart bars No significant difference with the overall value

gray chart bars No data on significance available

More information about the gauges and icons

Economy / Housing & Homes

Economy / Housing & Homes

Economy / Housing & Homes

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

Value
Compared to:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Simi Valley

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Simi Valley

64.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Simi Valley has a value of 64.4% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Simi Valley has a value of 64.4% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), Simi Valley has a value of 64.4% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Simi Valley has a value of 64.4% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Simi Valley has a value of 64.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Simi Valley value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Thousand Oaks

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place (City): Thousand Oaks

56.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Thousand Oaks has a value of 56.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Thousand Oaks has a value of 56.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), Thousand Oaks has a value of 56.8% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Thousand Oaks has a value of 56.8% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Thousand Oaks has a value of 56.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Thousand Oaks value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 91320

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 91320

55.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 91320 has a value of 55.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 91320 has a value of 55.6% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 91320 has a value of 55.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 91320 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 91360

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 91360

57.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 91360 has a value of 57.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 91360 has a value of 57.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 91360 has a value of 57.5% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 91360 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 91361

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 91361

55.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 91361 has a value of 55.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 91361 has a value of 55.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 91361 has a value of 55.1% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 91361 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 91362

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 91362

55.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 91362 has a value of 55.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 91362 has a value of 55.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 91362 has a value of 55.1% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 91362 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 91377

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 91377

52.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 91377 has a value of 52.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 91377 has a value of 52.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 91377 has a value of 52.3% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 91377 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93001

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93001

56.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93001 has a value of 56.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93001 has a value of 56.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 93001 has a value of 56.2% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93001 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93003

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93003

60.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93003 has a value of 60.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93003 has a value of 60.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 93003 has a value of 60.2% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93003 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93004

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93004

51.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93004 has a value of 51.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93004 has a value of 51.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 93004 has a value of 51.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93004 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93010

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93010

64.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93010 has a value of 64.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93010 has a value of 64.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 93010 has a value of 64.8% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93010 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93012

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93012

62.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93012 has a value of 62.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93012 has a value of 62.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 93012 has a value of 62.2% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93012 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93015

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93015

60.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93015 has a value of 60.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93015 has a value of 60.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 93015 has a value of 60.8% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93015 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93021

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93021

55.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93021 has a value of 55.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93021 has a value of 55.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 93021 has a value of 55.1% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93021 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93022

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93022

55.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93022 has a value of 55.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93022 has a value of 55.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 93022 has a value of 55.1% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93022 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93023

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93023

62.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93023 has a value of 62.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93023 has a value of 62.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 93023 has a value of 62.3% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93023 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93030

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93030

54.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93030 has a value of 54.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93030 has a value of 54.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 93030 has a value of 54.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93030 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93033

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93033

60.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93033 has a value of 60.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93033 has a value of 60.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 93033 has a value of 60.8% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93033 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93035

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93035

61.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93035 has a value of 61.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93035 has a value of 61.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 93035 has a value of 61.8% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93035 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93036

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93036

62.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93036 has a value of 62.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93036 has a value of 62.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 93036 has a value of 62.8% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93036 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93040

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93040

46.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93040 has a value of 46.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93040 has a value of 46.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 93040 has a value of 46.4% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93040 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93041

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93041

63.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93041 has a value of 63.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93041 has a value of 63.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 93041 has a value of 63.5% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93041 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93043

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93043

100.0%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93043 has a value of 100.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,641 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93043 has a value of 100.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 43.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 54.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,137 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (58.8%), 93043 has a value of 100.0% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(58.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93043 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93060

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93060

58.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93060 has a value of 58.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93060 has a value of 58.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 93060 has a value of 58.5% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93060 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93063

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93063

57.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93063 has a value of 57.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93063 has a value of 57.6% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 93063 has a value of 57.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93063 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93065

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93065

69.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93065 has a value of 69.4% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93065 has a value of 69.4% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 93065 has a value of 69.4% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93065 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93066

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 93066

57.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93066 has a value of 57.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93066 has a value of 57.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 93066 has a value of 57.5% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93066 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000100

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000100

60.5%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000100 has a value of 60.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,973 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000100 has a value of 60.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,074 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (57.9%), 06111000100 has a value of 60.5% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111000100 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000200

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000200

56.9%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000200 has a value of 56.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,973 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000200 has a value of 56.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,074 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (57.9%), 06111000200 has a value of 56.9% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111000200 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000302

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000302

58.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000302 has a value of 58.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000302 has a value of 58.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111000302 has a value of 58.2% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111000302 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000303

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000303

69.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000303 has a value of 69.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000303 has a value of 69.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111000303 has a value of 69.7% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111000303 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000304

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000304

58.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000304 has a value of 58.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000304 has a value of 58.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111000304 has a value of 58.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111000304 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000400

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000400

70.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000400 has a value of 70.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000400 has a value of 70.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111000400 has a value of 70.0% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111000400 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000500

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000500

55.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000500 has a value of 55.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000500 has a value of 55.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111000500 has a value of 55.2% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111000500 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000600

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000600

61.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000600 has a value of 61.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000600 has a value of 61.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111000600 has a value of 61.4% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111000600 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000701

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000701

61.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000701 has a value of 61.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000701 has a value of 61.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111000701 has a value of 61.2% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111000701 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000702

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000702

55.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000702 has a value of 55.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000702 has a value of 55.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111000702 has a value of 55.8% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111000702 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000800

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000800

40.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000800 has a value of 40.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000800 has a value of 40.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111000800 has a value of 40.7% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111000800 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000901

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000901

83.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000901 has a value of 83.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000901 has a value of 83.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111000901 has a value of 83.5% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111000901 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000902

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000902

59.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000902 has a value of 59.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000902 has a value of 59.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111000902 has a value of 59.0% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111000902 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000903

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111000903

60.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000903 has a value of 60.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000903 has a value of 60.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111000903 has a value of 60.5% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111000903 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001001

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001001

44.0%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001001 has a value of 44.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,973 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001001 has a value of 44.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,074 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (57.9%), 06111001001 has a value of 44.0% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111001001 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001002

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001002

47.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001002 has a value of 47.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001002 has a value of 47.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111001002 has a value of 47.2% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111001002 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001101

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001101

41.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001101 has a value of 41.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001101 has a value of 41.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111001101 has a value of 41.4% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111001101 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001102

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001102

70.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001102 has a value of 70.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001102 has a value of 70.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111001102 has a value of 70.0% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111001102 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001201

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001201

60.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001201 has a value of 60.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001201 has a value of 60.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111001201 has a value of 60.7% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111001201 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001202

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001202

32.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001202 has a value of 32.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001202 has a value of 32.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111001202 has a value of 32.5% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111001202 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001204

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001204

63.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001204 has a value of 63.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001204 has a value of 63.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111001204 has a value of 63.1% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111001204 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001206

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001206

82.6%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001206 has a value of 82.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,973 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001206 has a value of 82.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,074 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (57.9%), 06111001206 has a value of 82.6% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111001206 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001301

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001301

55.9%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001301 has a value of 55.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,973 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001301 has a value of 55.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,074 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (57.9%), 06111001301 has a value of 55.9% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111001301 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001302

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001302

39.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001302 has a value of 39.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001302 has a value of 39.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111001302 has a value of 39.3% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111001302 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001303

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001303

56.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001303 has a value of 56.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001303 has a value of 56.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111001303 has a value of 56.4% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001304

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001304

37.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001304 has a value of 37.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001304 has a value of 37.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111001304 has a value of 37.3% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001401

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001401

68.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001401 has a value of 68.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001401 has a value of 68.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111001401 has a value of 68.5% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111001401 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001402

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001402

46.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001402 has a value of 46.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001402 has a value of 46.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111001402 has a value of 46.0% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111001402 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001502

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001502

63.6%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001502 has a value of 63.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,973 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001502 has a value of 63.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,074 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (57.9%), 06111001502 has a value of 63.6% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111001502 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001503

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001503

64.5%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001503 has a value of 64.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,973 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001503 has a value of 64.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,074 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (57.9%), 06111001503 has a value of 64.5% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111001503 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001506

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001506

54.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001506 has a value of 54.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001506 has a value of 54.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111001506 has a value of 54.5% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111001506 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001507

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001507

55.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001507 has a value of 55.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001507 has a value of 55.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111001507 has a value of 55.7% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111001507 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001508

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001508

65.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001508 has a value of 65.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001508 has a value of 65.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111001508 has a value of 65.4% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001509

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001509

73.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001509 has a value of 73.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001509 has a value of 73.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111001509 has a value of 73.7% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001510

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001510

74.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001510 has a value of 74.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001510 has a value of 74.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111001510 has a value of 74.7% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001511

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001511

53.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001511 has a value of 53.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001511 has a value of 53.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111001511 has a value of 53.0% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001601

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001601

52.2%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001601 has a value of 52.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,973 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001601 has a value of 52.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,074 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (57.9%), 06111001601 has a value of 52.2% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111001601 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001602

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001602

53.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001602 has a value of 53.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001602 has a value of 53.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111001602 has a value of 53.7% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111001602 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001700

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001700

69.6%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001700 has a value of 69.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,973 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001700 has a value of 69.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,074 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (57.9%), 06111001700 has a value of 69.6% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111001700 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001800

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001800

43.5%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001800 has a value of 43.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,973 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001800 has a value of 43.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,074 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (57.9%), 06111001800 has a value of 43.5% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111001800 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001801

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001801

64.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001801 has a value of 64.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001801 has a value of 64.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111001801 has a value of 64.1% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001900

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001900

61.5%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001900 has a value of 61.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,973 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001900 has a value of 61.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,074 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (57.9%), 06111001900 has a value of 61.5% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111001900 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001901

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111001901

58.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001901 has a value of 58.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111001901 has a value of 58.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111001901 has a value of 58.8% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111002000

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111002000

52.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002000 has a value of 52.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002000 has a value of 52.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111002000 has a value of 52.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111002000 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111002102

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111002102

52.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002102 has a value of 52.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002102 has a value of 52.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111002102 has a value of 52.8% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111002102 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111002200

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111002200

53.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002200 has a value of 53.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002200 has a value of 53.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111002200 has a value of 53.5% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111002200 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111002300

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111002300

65.8%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002300 has a value of 65.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,973 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002300 has a value of 65.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,074 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (57.9%), 06111002300 has a value of 65.8% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111002300 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111002301

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111002301

71.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002301 has a value of 71.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002301 has a value of 71.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111002301 has a value of 71.8% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111002302

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111002302

79.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002302 has a value of 79.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002302 has a value of 79.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111002302 has a value of 79.4% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111002400

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111002400

50.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002400 has a value of 50.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002400 has a value of 50.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111002400 has a value of 50.7% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111002400 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111002500

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111002500

53.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002500 has a value of 53.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002500 has a value of 53.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111002500 has a value of 53.9% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111002500 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111002600

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111002600

43.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002600 has a value of 43.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002600 has a value of 43.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111002600 has a value of 43.3% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111002600 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111002700

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111002700

60.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002700 has a value of 60.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002700 has a value of 60.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111002700 has a value of 60.6% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111002700 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111002800

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111002800

48.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002800 has a value of 48.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002800 has a value of 48.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111002800 has a value of 48.7% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111002800 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111002901

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111002901

79.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002901 has a value of 79.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002901 has a value of 79.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111002901 has a value of 79.0% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111002901 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111002905

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111002905

65.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111002905 has a value of 65.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111002905 has a value of 65.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111002905 has a value of 65.3% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111002905 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003010

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003010

45.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003010 has a value of 45.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003010 has a value of 45.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111003010 has a value of 45.1% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111003010 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003011

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003011

68.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003011 has a value of 68.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003011 has a value of 68.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111003011 has a value of 68.8% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111003011 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003012

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003012

92.2%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003012 has a value of 92.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,973 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003012 has a value of 92.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,074 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (57.9%), 06111003012 has a value of 92.2% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111003012 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003013

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003013

52.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003013 has a value of 52.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003013 has a value of 52.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111003013 has a value of 52.5% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111003013 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003100

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003100

57.7%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003100 has a value of 57.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,973 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003100 has a value of 57.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,074 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (57.9%), 06111003100 has a value of 57.7% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111003100 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003101

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003101

39.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003101 has a value of 39.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003101 has a value of 39.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111003101 has a value of 39.8% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003102

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003102

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003102 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003102 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111003102 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003201

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003201

46.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003201 has a value of 46.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003201 has a value of 46.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111003201 has a value of 46.5% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111003201 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003300

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003300

50.8%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003300 has a value of 50.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,973 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003300 has a value of 50.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,074 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (57.9%), 06111003300 has a value of 50.8% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111003300 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003301

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003301

56.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003301 has a value of 56.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003301 has a value of 56.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111003301 has a value of 56.8% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003302

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003302

46.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003302 has a value of 46.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003302 has a value of 46.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111003302 has a value of 46.2% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003605

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003605

47.0%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003605 has a value of 47.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,973 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003605 has a value of 47.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,074 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (57.9%), 06111003605 has a value of 47.0% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111003605 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003608

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003608

69.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003608 has a value of 69.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003608 has a value of 69.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111003608 has a value of 69.0% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111003608 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003609

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003609

36.8%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003609 has a value of 36.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,973 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003609 has a value of 36.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,074 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (57.9%), 06111003609 has a value of 36.8% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111003609 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003612

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003612

67.2%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003612 has a value of 67.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,973 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003612 has a value of 67.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,074 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (57.9%), 06111003612 has a value of 67.2% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111003612 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003613

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003613

65.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003613 has a value of 65.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003613 has a value of 65.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111003613 has a value of 65.6% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003614

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003614

50.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003614 has a value of 50.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003614 has a value of 50.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111003614 has a value of 50.4% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003615

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003615

30.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003615 has a value of 30.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003615 has a value of 30.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111003615 has a value of 30.4% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003616

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003616

28.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003616 has a value of 28.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003616 has a value of 28.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111003616 has a value of 28.8% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003617

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003617

65.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003617 has a value of 65.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003617 has a value of 65.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111003617 has a value of 65.7% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003618

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003618

87.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003618 has a value of 87.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003618 has a value of 87.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111003618 has a value of 87.4% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003700

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003700

74.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003700 has a value of 74.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003700 has a value of 74.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111003700 has a value of 74.0% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111003700 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003801

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003801

79.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003801 has a value of 79.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003801 has a value of 79.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111003801 has a value of 79.1% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111003801 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003802

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003802

71.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003802 has a value of 71.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003802 has a value of 71.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111003802 has a value of 71.5% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111003802 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003900

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003900

76.0%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003900 has a value of 76.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,973 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003900 has a value of 76.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,074 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (57.9%), 06111003900 has a value of 76.0% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111003900 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003901

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003901

77.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003901 has a value of 77.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003901 has a value of 77.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111003901 has a value of 77.6% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003902

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111003902

74.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111003902 has a value of 74.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111003902 has a value of 74.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111003902 has a value of 74.3% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111004000

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111004000

41.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004000 has a value of 41.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004000 has a value of 41.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111004000 has a value of 41.5% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111004000 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111004101

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111004101

66.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004101 has a value of 66.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004101 has a value of 66.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111004101 has a value of 66.1% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111004101 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111004200

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111004200

55.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004200 has a value of 55.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004200 has a value of 55.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111004200 has a value of 55.1% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111004200 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111004304

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111004304

56.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004304 has a value of 56.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004304 has a value of 56.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111004304 has a value of 56.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111004304 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111004305

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111004305

65.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004305 has a value of 65.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004305 has a value of 65.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111004305 has a value of 65.9% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111004305 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111004400

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111004400

61.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004400 has a value of 61.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004400 has a value of 61.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111004400 has a value of 61.9% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111004400 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111004503

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111004503

56.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004503 has a value of 56.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004503 has a value of 56.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111004503 has a value of 56.5% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111004503 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111004504

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111004504

53.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004504 has a value of 53.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004504 has a value of 53.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111004504 has a value of 53.3% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111004504 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111004505

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111004505

65.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004505 has a value of 65.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004505 has a value of 65.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111004505 has a value of 65.0% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111004505 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111004506

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111004506

80.5%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004506 has a value of 80.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,973 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004506 has a value of 80.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,074 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (57.9%), 06111004506 has a value of 80.5% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111004506 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111004507

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111004507

61.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004507 has a value of 61.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004507 has a value of 61.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111004507 has a value of 61.7% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111004508

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111004508

66.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004508 has a value of 66.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004508 has a value of 66.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111004508 has a value of 66.1% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111004600

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111004600

89.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004600 has a value of 89.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004600 has a value of 89.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111004600 has a value of 89.6% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111004600 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111004704

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111004704

56.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004704 has a value of 56.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004704 has a value of 56.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111004704 has a value of 56.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111004704 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111004710

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111004710

33.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004710 has a value of 33.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004710 has a value of 33.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111004710 has a value of 33.7% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111004710 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111004711

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111004711

48.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004711 has a value of 48.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004711 has a value of 48.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111004711 has a value of 48.3% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111004711 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111004715

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111004715

55.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004715 has a value of 55.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004715 has a value of 55.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111004715 has a value of 55.3% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111004715 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111004716

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111004716

68.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004716 has a value of 68.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004716 has a value of 68.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111004716 has a value of 68.7% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111004716 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111004717

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111004717

64.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004717 has a value of 64.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004717 has a value of 64.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111004717 has a value of 64.2% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111004717 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111004901

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111004901

55.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004901 has a value of 55.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004901 has a value of 55.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111004901 has a value of 55.4% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111004901 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111004902

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111004902

43.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111004902 has a value of 43.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111004902 has a value of 43.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111004902 has a value of 43.8% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111004902 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005002

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005002

57.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005002 has a value of 57.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005002 has a value of 57.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111005002 has a value of 57.1% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111005002 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005003

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005003

60.6%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005003 has a value of 60.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,973 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005003 has a value of 60.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,074 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (57.9%), 06111005003 has a value of 60.6% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111005003 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005004

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005004

70.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005004 has a value of 70.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005004 has a value of 70.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111005004 has a value of 70.3% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111005004 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005005

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005005

56.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005005 has a value of 56.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005005 has a value of 56.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111005005 has a value of 56.7% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005006

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005006

57.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005006 has a value of 57.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005006 has a value of 57.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111005006 has a value of 57.7% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005100

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005100

48.7%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005100 has a value of 48.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,973 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005100 has a value of 48.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,074 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (57.9%), 06111005100 has a value of 48.7% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111005100 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005202

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005202

60.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005202 has a value of 60.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005202 has a value of 60.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111005202 has a value of 60.2% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111005202 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005203

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005203

69.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005203 has a value of 69.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005203 has a value of 69.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111005203 has a value of 69.0% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111005203 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005204

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005204

94.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005204 has a value of 94.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005204 has a value of 94.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111005204 has a value of 94.3% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111005204 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005205

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005205

47.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005205 has a value of 47.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005205 has a value of 47.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111005205 has a value of 47.0% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111005205 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005303

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005303

48.3%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005303 has a value of 48.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,973 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005303 has a value of 48.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,074 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (57.9%), 06111005303 has a value of 48.3% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111005303 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005304

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005304

67.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005304 has a value of 67.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005304 has a value of 67.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111005304 has a value of 67.5% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111005304 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005305

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005305

57.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005305 has a value of 57.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005305 has a value of 57.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111005305 has a value of 57.2% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111005305 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005306

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005306

37.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005306 has a value of 37.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005306 has a value of 37.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111005306 has a value of 37.2% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111005306 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005307

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005307

64.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005307 has a value of 64.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005307 has a value of 64.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111005307 has a value of 64.3% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005308

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005308

80.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005308 has a value of 80.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005308 has a value of 80.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111005308 has a value of 80.5% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005401

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005401

85.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005401 has a value of 85.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005401 has a value of 85.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111005401 has a value of 85.7% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111005401 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005403

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005403

57.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005403 has a value of 57.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005403 has a value of 57.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111005403 has a value of 57.4% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111005403 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005404

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005404

54.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005404 has a value of 54.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005404 has a value of 54.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111005404 has a value of 54.3% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111005404 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)