Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Addressing Mental Health and Substance Use Across the Lifespan

This is a priority based on the 2022-2024 Community Health Needs Assessment, which includes:
  1. Adverse Childhood Experiences
    1. Substance Use
    2. Adolescent Health
    3. Education
    4. Housing Overcrowding
  2. Health and Wellness for Older Adults

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

green chart bars Significantly better than the overall value

red chart bars Significantly worse than the overall value

dark blue chart bars Significantly different than the overall value

light blue chart bars No significant difference with the overall value

gray chart bars No data on significance available

More information about the gauges and icons

Economy / Housing & Homes

Economy / Housing & Homes

Economy / Housing & Homes

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

Value
Compared to:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005502

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005502

68.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005502 has a value of 68.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005502 has a value of 68.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111005502 has a value of 68.6% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111005502 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005503

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005503

83.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005503 has a value of 83.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005503 has a value of 83.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111005503 has a value of 83.6% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111005503 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005504

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005504

56.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005504 has a value of 56.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005504 has a value of 56.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111005504 has a value of 56.2% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111005504 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005600

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005600

50.4%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005600 has a value of 50.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,973 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005600 has a value of 50.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,074 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (57.9%), 06111005600 has a value of 50.4% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111005600 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005601

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005601

68.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005601 has a value of 68.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005601 has a value of 68.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111005601 has a value of 68.4% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005602

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005602

53.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005602 has a value of 53.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005602 has a value of 53.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111005602 has a value of 53.8% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005700

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005700

40.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005700 has a value of 40.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005700 has a value of 40.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111005700 has a value of 40.3% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111005700 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005801

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005801

74.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005801 has a value of 74.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005801 has a value of 74.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111005801 has a value of 74.1% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111005801 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005802

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005802

69.0%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005802 has a value of 69.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,973 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005802 has a value of 69.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,074 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (57.9%), 06111005802 has a value of 69.0% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111005802 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005803

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005803

56.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005803 has a value of 56.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005803 has a value of 56.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111005803 has a value of 56.4% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005804

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005804

48.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005804 has a value of 48.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005804 has a value of 48.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111005804 has a value of 48.9% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005901

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005901

68.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005901 has a value of 68.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005901 has a value of 68.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111005901 has a value of 68.2% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111005901 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005906

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005906

49.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005906 has a value of 49.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005906 has a value of 49.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111005906 has a value of 49.8% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111005906 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005907

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005907

53.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005907 has a value of 53.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005907 has a value of 53.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111005907 has a value of 53.2% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111005907 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005908

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005908

55.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005908 has a value of 55.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005908 has a value of 55.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111005908 has a value of 55.2% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111005908 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005909

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005909

39.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005909 has a value of 39.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005909 has a value of 39.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111005909 has a value of 39.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111005909 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005910

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005910

65.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005910 has a value of 65.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005910 has a value of 65.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111005910 has a value of 65.0% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111005910 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005911

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111005911

73.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005911 has a value of 73.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005911 has a value of 73.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111005911 has a value of 73.2% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111005911 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111006000

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111006000

70.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006000 has a value of 70.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006000 has a value of 70.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111006000 has a value of 70.6% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111006000 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111006100

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111006100

43.5%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006100 has a value of 43.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,973 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006100 has a value of 43.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,074 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (57.9%), 06111006100 has a value of 43.5% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111006100 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111006101

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111006101

70.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006101 has a value of 70.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006101 has a value of 70.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111006101 has a value of 70.5% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111006102

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111006102

44.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006102 has a value of 44.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006102 has a value of 44.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111006102 has a value of 44.9% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111006200

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111006200

53.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006200 has a value of 53.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006200 has a value of 53.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111006200 has a value of 53.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111006200 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111006301

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111006301

77.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006301 has a value of 77.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006301 has a value of 77.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111006301 has a value of 77.2% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111006301 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111006302

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111006302

64.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006302 has a value of 64.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006302 has a value of 64.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111006302 has a value of 64.5% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111006302 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111006400

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111006400

65.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006400 has a value of 65.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006400 has a value of 65.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111006400 has a value of 65.9% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111006400 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111006500

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111006500

51.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006500 has a value of 51.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006500 has a value of 51.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111006500 has a value of 51.2% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111006500 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111006600

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111006600

56.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006600 has a value of 56.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006600 has a value of 56.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111006600 has a value of 56.3% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111006600 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111006700

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111006700

38.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006700 has a value of 38.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006700 has a value of 38.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111006700 has a value of 38.1% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111006700 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111006800

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111006800

61.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006800 has a value of 61.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006800 has a value of 61.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111006800 has a value of 61.9% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111006800 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111006900

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111006900

54.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006900 has a value of 54.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006900 has a value of 54.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111006900 has a value of 54.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111006900 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007000

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007000

52.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007000 has a value of 52.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007000 has a value of 52.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111007000 has a value of 52.1% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111007000 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007100

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007100

64.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007100 has a value of 64.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007100 has a value of 64.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111007100 has a value of 64.2% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111007100 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007201

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007201

78.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007201 has a value of 78.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007201 has a value of 78.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111007201 has a value of 78.0% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111007201 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007202

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007202

70.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007202 has a value of 70.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007202 has a value of 70.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111007202 has a value of 70.4% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111007202 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007300

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007300

58.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007300 has a value of 58.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007300 has a value of 58.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111007300 has a value of 58.4% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111007300 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007402

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007402

20.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007402 has a value of 20.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007402 has a value of 20.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111007402 has a value of 20.1% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111007402 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007403

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007403

55.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007403 has a value of 55.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007403 has a value of 55.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111007403 has a value of 55.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111007403 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007405

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007405

45.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007405 has a value of 45.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007405 has a value of 45.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111007405 has a value of 45.0% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111007405 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007406

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007406

60.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007406 has a value of 60.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007406 has a value of 60.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111007406 has a value of 60.5% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111007406 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007505

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007505

70.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007505 has a value of 70.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007505 has a value of 70.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111007505 has a value of 70.8% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111007505 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007506

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007506

83.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007506 has a value of 83.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007506 has a value of 83.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111007506 has a value of 83.1% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111007506 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007507

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007507

64.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007507 has a value of 64.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007507 has a value of 64.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111007507 has a value of 64.3% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111007507 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007508

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007508

43.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007508 has a value of 43.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007508 has a value of 43.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111007508 has a value of 43.1% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111007508 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007509

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007509

55.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007509 has a value of 55.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007509 has a value of 55.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111007509 has a value of 55.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111007509 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007510

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007510

57.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007510 has a value of 57.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007510 has a value of 57.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111007510 has a value of 57.9% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111007510 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007511

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007511

25.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007511 has a value of 25.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007511 has a value of 25.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111007511 has a value of 25.9% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111007511 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007512

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007512

73.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007512 has a value of 73.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007512 has a value of 73.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111007512 has a value of 73.2% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111007512 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007513

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007513

100.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007513 has a value of 100.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007513 has a value of 100.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111007513 has a value of 100.0% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111007513 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007514

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007514

60.3%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007514 has a value of 60.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,973 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007514 has a value of 60.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,074 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (57.9%), 06111007514 has a value of 60.3% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111007514 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007515

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007515

77.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007515 has a value of 77.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007515 has a value of 77.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111007515 has a value of 77.6% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007516

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007516

60.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007516 has a value of 60.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007516 has a value of 60.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111007516 has a value of 60.2% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007606

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007606

100.0%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007606 has a value of 100.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,973 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007606 has a value of 100.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,074 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (57.9%), 06111007606 has a value of 100.0% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111007606 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007607

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007607

3.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007607 has a value of 3.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007607 has a value of 3.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111007607 has a value of 3.5% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111007607 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007609

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007609

23.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007609 has a value of 23.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007609 has a value of 23.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111007609 has a value of 23.7% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111007609 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007610

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007610

67.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007610 has a value of 67.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007610 has a value of 67.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111007610 has a value of 67.1% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111007610 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007611

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007611

52.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007611 has a value of 52.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007611 has a value of 52.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111007611 has a value of 52.4% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111007611 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007612

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007612

66.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007612 has a value of 66.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007612 has a value of 66.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111007612 has a value of 66.3% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111007612 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007613

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007613

56.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007613 has a value of 56.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007613 has a value of 56.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111007613 has a value of 56.5% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111007613 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007614

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007614

26.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007614 has a value of 26.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007614 has a value of 26.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111007614 has a value of 26.3% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111007614 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007700

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007700

72.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007700 has a value of 72.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007700 has a value of 72.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111007700 has a value of 72.8% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111007700 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007800

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007800

79.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007800 has a value of 79.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007800 has a value of 79.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111007800 has a value of 79.9% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111007800 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007901

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007901

67.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007901 has a value of 67.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007901 has a value of 67.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111007901 has a value of 67.9% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111007901 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007903

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007903

54.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007903 has a value of 54.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007903 has a value of 54.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111007903 has a value of 54.4% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111007903 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007904

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111007904

72.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007904 has a value of 72.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007904 has a value of 72.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111007904 has a value of 72.5% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111007904 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008001

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008001

42.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008001 has a value of 42.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008001 has a value of 42.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111008001 has a value of 42.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111008001 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008002

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008002

47.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008002 has a value of 47.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008002 has a value of 47.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111008002 has a value of 47.0% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111008002 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008004

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008004

50.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008004 has a value of 50.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008004 has a value of 50.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111008004 has a value of 50.0% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111008004 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008005

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008005

63.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008005 has a value of 63.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008005 has a value of 63.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111008005 has a value of 63.0% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111008005 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008101

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008101

70.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008101 has a value of 70.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008101 has a value of 70.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111008101 has a value of 70.1% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111008101 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008201

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008201

53.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008201 has a value of 53.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008201 has a value of 53.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111008201 has a value of 53.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111008201 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008202

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008202

67.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008202 has a value of 67.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008202 has a value of 67.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111008202 has a value of 67.9% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111008202 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008302

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008302

53.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008302 has a value of 53.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008302 has a value of 53.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111008302 has a value of 53.1% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111008302 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008303

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008303

59.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008303 has a value of 59.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008303 has a value of 59.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111008303 has a value of 59.7% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111008303 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008304

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008304

62.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008304 has a value of 62.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008304 has a value of 62.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111008304 has a value of 62.3% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111008304 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008305

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008305

100.0%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008305 has a value of 100.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,973 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008305 has a value of 100.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,074 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (57.9%), 06111008305 has a value of 100.0% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111008305 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008306

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008306

56.1%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008306 has a value of 56.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,973 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008306 has a value of 56.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,074 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (57.9%), 06111008306 has a value of 56.1% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111008306 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008307

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008307

53.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008307 has a value of 53.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008307 has a value of 53.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111008307 has a value of 53.7% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008308

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008308

33.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008308 has a value of 33.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008308 has a value of 33.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111008308 has a value of 33.3% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008401

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008401

63.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008401 has a value of 63.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008401 has a value of 63.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111008401 has a value of 63.7% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111008401 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008402

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008402

38.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008402 has a value of 38.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008402 has a value of 38.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111008402 has a value of 38.7% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111008402 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008500

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008500

78.1%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008500 has a value of 78.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,973 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008500 has a value of 78.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,074 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (57.9%), 06111008500 has a value of 78.1% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111008500 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008501

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008501

69.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008501 has a value of 69.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008501 has a value of 69.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111008501 has a value of 69.5% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008502

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008502

73.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008502 has a value of 73.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008502 has a value of 73.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111008502 has a value of 73.6% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008600

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008600

54.9%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008600 has a value of 54.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,973 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008600 has a value of 54.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,074 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (57.9%), 06111008600 has a value of 54.9% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111008600 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008601

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008601

24.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008601 has a value of 24.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008601 has a value of 24.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111008601 has a value of 24.5% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008602

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008602

65.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008602 has a value of 65.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008602 has a value of 65.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111008602 has a value of 65.0% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008700

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008700

63.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008700 has a value of 63.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008700 has a value of 63.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111008700 has a value of 63.9% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111008700 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008800

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008800

83.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008800 has a value of 83.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008800 has a value of 83.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111008800 has a value of 83.7% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111008800 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008900

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111008900

39.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008900 has a value of 39.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008900 has a value of 39.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111008900 has a value of 39.0% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111008900 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111009100

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111009100

75.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111009100 has a value of 75.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111009100 has a value of 75.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111009100 has a value of 75.9% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 06111009100 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111009200

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111009200

60.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111009200 has a value of 60.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111009200 has a value of 60.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111009200 has a value of 60.9% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111009300

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111009300

69.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111009300 has a value of 69.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111009300 has a value of 69.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111009300 has a value of 69.9% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111009400

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111009400

60.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111009400 has a value of 60.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111009400 has a value of 60.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111009400 has a value of 60.3% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111009500

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111009500

61.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111009500 has a value of 61.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111009500 has a value of 61.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111009500 has a value of 61.0% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111009600

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111009600

48.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111009600 has a value of 48.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111009600 has a value of 48.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111009600 has a value of 48.1% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111009700

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06111009700

54.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111009700 has a value of 54.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 54.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111009700 has a value of 54.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (59.6%), 06111009700 has a value of 54.3% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Economy / Housing & Homes

Residential Segregation - Black/White

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

Residential Segregation - Black/White

Value
Compared to:

Residential Segregation - Black/White County: Ventura

Current Value:

Residential Segregation - Black/White County: Ventura

49.1
Score
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Ventura has a value of 49.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.5.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 52 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ventura has a value of 49.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 50.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,076 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (58.0), Ventura has a value of 49.1 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(58.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (62.7), Ventura has a value of 49.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(62.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ventura (49.1) is less and better than the previously measured value (51.4).
Prior Value
(51.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ventura value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Housing & Homes

Severe Housing Problems

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

Severe Housing Problems

Value
Compared to:

Severe Housing Problems County: Ventura

Current Value:

Severe Housing Problems County: Ventura

22.9%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Ventura has a value of 22.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.1%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ventura has a value of 22.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (25.7%), Ventura has a value of 22.9% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(25.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Ventura has a value of 22.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ventura (22.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.9%).
Prior Value
(22.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ventura value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Child Care Centers

Value
Compared to:

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Child Care Centers

Value
Compared to:

Child Care Centers County: Ventura

Current Value:

Child Care Centers County: Ventura

6.3
Per 1,000 population under age 5
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Ventura has a value of 6.3 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 8.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 5.4.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (8.1), Ventura has a value of 6.3 which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(8.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0), Ventura has a value of 6.3 which is lower and worse.
US Value
(7.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ventura (6.3) is greater and better than the previously measured value (4.9).
Prior Value
(4.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Education / Educational Attainment

Education / Educational Attainment

Education / Educational Attainment

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher

Value
Compared to:

Education / Educational Attainment

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher

Value
Compared to:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher County: Ventura

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher County: Ventura

38.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Ventura has a value of 38.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 33.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 21.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 42 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ventura has a value of 38.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 32.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 24.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (37.0%), Ventura has a value of 38.2% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(37.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (35.7%), Ventura has a value of 38.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(35.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ventura (38.2%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (34.7%).
Prior Value
(34.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ventura value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): Bell Canyon

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): Bell Canyon

72.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Bell Canyon has a value of 72.6% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 12.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Bell Canyon has a value of 72.6% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 19.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 11.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), Bell Canyon has a value of 72.6% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (35.9%), Bell Canyon has a value of 72.6% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(35.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Bell Canyon has a value of 72.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bell Canyon value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): Camarillo

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): Camarillo

43.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Camarillo has a value of 43.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 12.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Camarillo has a value of 43.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 19.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 11.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), Camarillo has a value of 43.0% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (35.9%), Camarillo has a value of 43.0% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(35.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Camarillo has a value of 43.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Camarillo value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): Casa Conejo

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): Casa Conejo

40.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Casa Conejo has a value of 40.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 12.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Casa Conejo has a value of 40.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 19.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 11.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), Casa Conejo has a value of 40.4% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (35.9%), Casa Conejo has a value of 40.4% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(35.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Casa Conejo has a value of 40.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Casa Conejo value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): Channel Islands Beach

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): Channel Islands Beach

35.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Channel Islands Beach has a value of 35.8% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 12.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Channel Islands Beach has a value of 35.8% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 19.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 11.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), Channel Islands Beach has a value of 35.8% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (35.9%), Channel Islands Beach has a value of 35.8% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(35.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Channel Islands Beach has a value of 35.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Channel Islands Beach value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): El Rio

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): El Rio

8.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, El Rio has a value of 8.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 12.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, El Rio has a value of 8.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 19.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 11.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), El Rio has a value of 8.0% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (35.9%), El Rio has a value of 8.0% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(35.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), El Rio has a value of 8.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the El Rio value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): Fillmore

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): Fillmore

16.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Fillmore has a value of 16.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 12.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Fillmore has a value of 16.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 19.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 11.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), Fillmore has a value of 16.7% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (35.9%), Fillmore has a value of 16.7% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(35.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Fillmore has a value of 16.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Fillmore value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): Lake Sherwood

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): Lake Sherwood

67.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Lake Sherwood has a value of 67.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 12.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Lake Sherwood has a value of 67.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 19.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 11.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), Lake Sherwood has a value of 67.7% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (35.9%), Lake Sherwood has a value of 67.7% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(35.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Lake Sherwood has a value of 67.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lake Sherwood value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): Meiners Oaks

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): Meiners Oaks

27.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Meiners Oaks has a value of 27.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 12.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Meiners Oaks has a value of 27.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 19.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 11.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), Meiners Oaks has a value of 27.2% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (35.9%), Meiners Oaks has a value of 27.2% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(35.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Meiners Oaks has a value of 27.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Meiners Oaks value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): Mira Monte

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): Mira Monte

40.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Mira Monte has a value of 40.8% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 12.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Mira Monte has a value of 40.8% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 19.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 11.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), Mira Monte has a value of 40.8% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (35.9%), Mira Monte has a value of 40.8% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(35.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Mira Monte has a value of 40.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mira Monte value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): Moorpark

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): Moorpark

43.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Moorpark has a value of 43.5% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 12.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Moorpark has a value of 43.5% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 19.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 11.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), Moorpark has a value of 43.5% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (35.9%), Moorpark has a value of 43.5% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(35.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Moorpark has a value of 43.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Moorpark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): Oak Park

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): Oak Park

61.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Oak Park has a value of 61.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 12.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Oak Park has a value of 61.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 19.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 11.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), Oak Park has a value of 61.3% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (35.9%), Oak Park has a value of 61.3% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(35.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Oak Park has a value of 61.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Oak Park value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): Oak View

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): Oak View

29.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Oak View has a value of 29.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 12.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Oak View has a value of 29.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 19.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 11.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), Oak View has a value of 29.1% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (35.9%), Oak View has a value of 29.1% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(35.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Oak View has a value of 29.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Oak View value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): Ojai

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): Ojai

43.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Ojai has a value of 43.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 12.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Ojai has a value of 43.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 19.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 11.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), Ojai has a value of 43.1% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (35.9%), Ojai has a value of 43.1% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(35.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Ojai has a value of 43.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Ojai value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): Oxnard

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): Oxnard

19.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Oxnard has a value of 19.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 12.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Oxnard has a value of 19.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 19.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 11.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), Oxnard has a value of 19.2% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (35.9%), Oxnard has a value of 19.2% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(35.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Oxnard has a value of 19.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Oxnard value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): Piru

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): Piru

11.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Piru has a value of 11.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 12.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Piru has a value of 11.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 19.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 11.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), Piru has a value of 11.2% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (35.9%), Piru has a value of 11.2% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(35.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Piru has a value of 11.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Piru value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): Port Hueneme

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): Port Hueneme

20.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Port Hueneme has a value of 20.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 12.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Port Hueneme has a value of 20.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 19.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 11.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), Port Hueneme has a value of 20.1% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (35.9%), Port Hueneme has a value of 20.1% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(35.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Port Hueneme has a value of 20.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Port Hueneme value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): San Buenaventura (Ventura)

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): San Buenaventura (Ventura)

40.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, San Buenaventura (Ventura) has a value of 40.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 12.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, San Buenaventura (Ventura) has a value of 40.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 19.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 11.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), San Buenaventura (Ventura) has a value of 40.1% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (35.9%), San Buenaventura (Ventura) has a value of 40.1% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(35.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), San Buenaventura (Ventura) has a value of 40.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the San Buenaventura (Ventura) value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): Santa Paula

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): Santa Paula

13.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Santa Paula has a value of 13.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 12.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Santa Paula has a value of 13.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 19.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 11.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), Santa Paula has a value of 13.9% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (35.9%), Santa Paula has a value of 13.9% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(35.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Santa Paula has a value of 13.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Santa Paula value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): Santa Rosa Valley

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): Santa Rosa Valley

58.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Santa Rosa Valley has a value of 58.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 12.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Santa Rosa Valley has a value of 58.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 19.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 11.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), Santa Rosa Valley has a value of 58.0% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (35.9%), Santa Rosa Valley has a value of 58.0% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(35.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Santa Rosa Valley has a value of 58.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Santa Rosa Valley value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): Santa Susana

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): Santa Susana

27.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Santa Susana has a value of 27.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 12.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Santa Susana has a value of 27.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 19.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 11.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), Santa Susana has a value of 27.3% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (35.9%), Santa Susana has a value of 27.3% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(35.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Santa Susana has a value of 27.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Santa Susana value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): Saticoy

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): Saticoy

14.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Saticoy has a value of 14.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 12.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Saticoy has a value of 14.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 19.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 11.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), Saticoy has a value of 14.4% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (35.9%), Saticoy has a value of 14.4% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(35.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Saticoy has a value of 14.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Saticoy value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): Simi Valley

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): Simi Valley

36.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Simi Valley has a value of 36.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 12.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Simi Valley has a value of 36.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 19.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 11.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), Simi Valley has a value of 36.0% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (35.9%), Simi Valley has a value of 36.0% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(35.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Simi Valley has a value of 36.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Simi Valley value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): Thousand Oaks

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Place (City): Thousand Oaks

49.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Thousand Oaks has a value of 49.6% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 12.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Thousand Oaks has a value of 49.6% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 19.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 11.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), Thousand Oaks has a value of 49.6% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (35.9%), Thousand Oaks has a value of 49.6% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(35.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Thousand Oaks has a value of 49.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Thousand Oaks value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 91320

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 91320

51.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 91320 has a value of 51.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 30.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 91320 has a value of 51.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 21.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 14.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), 91320 has a value of 51.9% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 91320 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 91360

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 91360

43.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 91360 has a value of 43.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 30.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 91360 has a value of 43.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 21.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 14.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), 91360 has a value of 43.0% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 91360 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 91361

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 91361

60.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 91361 has a value of 60.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 30.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 91361 has a value of 60.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 21.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 14.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), 91361 has a value of 60.1% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 91361 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 91362

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 91362

53.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 91362 has a value of 53.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 30.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 91362 has a value of 53.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 21.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 14.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), 91362 has a value of 53.5% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 91362 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 91377

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 91377

61.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 91377 has a value of 61.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 30.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 91377 has a value of 61.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 21.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 14.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), 91377 has a value of 61.3% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 91377 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 93001

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 93001

35.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93001 has a value of 35.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 30.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93001 has a value of 35.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 21.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 14.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), 93001 has a value of 35.9% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93001 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 93003

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 93003

41.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93003 has a value of 41.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 30.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93003 has a value of 41.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 21.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 14.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), 93003 has a value of 41.5% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93003 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 93004

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 93004

38.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93004 has a value of 38.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 30.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93004 has a value of 38.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 21.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 14.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), 93004 has a value of 38.7% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93004 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 93010

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 93010

40.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93010 has a value of 40.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 30.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93010 has a value of 40.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 21.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 14.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), 93010 has a value of 40.0% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93010 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 93012

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 93012

48.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93012 has a value of 48.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 30.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93012 has a value of 48.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 21.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 14.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), 93012 has a value of 48.9% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93012 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 93015

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 93015

16.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93015 has a value of 16.7% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 30.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93015 has a value of 16.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 21.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 14.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), 93015 has a value of 16.7% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93015 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 93021

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 93021

43.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93021 has a value of 43.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 30.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93021 has a value of 43.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 21.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 14.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), 93021 has a value of 43.3% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93021 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 93022

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 93022

28.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93022 has a value of 28.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 30.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93022 has a value of 28.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 21.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 14.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), 93022 has a value of 28.8% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93022 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 93023

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 93023

39.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93023 has a value of 39.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 30.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93023 has a value of 39.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 21.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 14.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), 93023 has a value of 39.5% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93023 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 93030

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 93030

17.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93030 has a value of 17.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 30.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93030 has a value of 17.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 21.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 14.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), 93030 has a value of 17.1% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93030 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 93033

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 93033

11.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93033 has a value of 11.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 30.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93033 has a value of 11.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 21.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 14.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), 93033 has a value of 11.5% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93033 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 93035

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 93035

34.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93035 has a value of 34.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 30.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93035 has a value of 34.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 21.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 14.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), 93035 has a value of 34.0% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93035 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 93036

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 93036

23.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93036 has a value of 23.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 30.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93036 has a value of 23.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 21.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 14.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), 93036 has a value of 23.9% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93036 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 93040

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 93040

10.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93040 has a value of 10.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 30.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93040 has a value of 10.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 21.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 14.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), 93040 has a value of 10.5% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93040 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 93041

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 93041

20.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93041 has a value of 20.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 30.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93041 has a value of 20.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 21.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 14.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), 93041 has a value of 20.0% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93041 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 93042

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 93042

13.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93042 has a value of 13.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 30.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93042 has a value of 13.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 21.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 14.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), 93042 has a value of 13.3% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93042 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 93043

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 93043

28.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93043 has a value of 28.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 30.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93043 has a value of 28.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 21.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 14.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), 93043 has a value of 28.2% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93043 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 93060

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 93060

15.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93060 has a value of 15.1% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 30.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93060 has a value of 15.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 21.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 14.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), 93060 has a value of 15.1% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93060 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 93063

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 93063

33.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93063 has a value of 33.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 30.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93063 has a value of 33.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 21.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 14.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), 93063 has a value of 33.4% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93063 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 93065

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 93065

38.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93065 has a value of 38.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 30.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93065 has a value of 38.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 21.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 14.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), 93065 has a value of 38.1% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93065 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 93066

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Zip Code: 93066

34.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93066 has a value of 34.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 30.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93066 has a value of 34.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 21.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 14.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (34.7%), 93066 has a value of 34.8% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Over time, the 93066 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.