Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Prevention of Chronic Conditions by Promoting Healthy Lifestyles

This is a priority based on the 2022-2024 Community Health Needs Assessment, which includes:
  • Cancer
  • Diabetes
  • Heart Disease and Stroke
  • Nutrition and Healthy Eating
  • Physical Activity
  • Weight Status

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

green chart bars Significantly better than the overall value

red chart bars Significantly worse than the overall value

dark blue chart bars Significantly different than the overall value

light blue chart bars No significant difference with the overall value

gray chart bars No data on significance available

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days

Value
Compared to:

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days

Value
Compared to:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111005803

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111005803

36.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005803 has a value of 36.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005803 has a value of 36.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111005803 has a value of 36.5% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111005804

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111005804

41.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005804 has a value of 41.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005804 has a value of 41.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111005804 has a value of 41.4% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111005901

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111005901

37.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005901 has a value of 37.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005901 has a value of 37.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111005901 has a value of 37.8% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111005901 (37.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (38.6%).
Prior Value
(38.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111005901 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111005906

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111005906

38.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005906 has a value of 38.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005906 has a value of 38.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111005906 has a value of 38.0% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111005906 (38.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (37.6%).
Prior Value
(37.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111005906 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111005907

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111005907

33.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005907 has a value of 33.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005907 has a value of 33.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111005907 has a value of 33.2% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111005907 (33.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (33.6%).
Prior Value
(33.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111005907 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111005908

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111005908

40.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005908 has a value of 40.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005908 has a value of 40.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111005908 has a value of 40.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111005908 (40.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (40.3%).
Prior Value
(40.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111005908 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111005909

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111005909

37.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005909 has a value of 37.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005909 has a value of 37.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111005909 has a value of 37.1% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111005909 (37.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (37.2%).
Prior Value
(37.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111005909 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111005910

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111005910

36.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005910 has a value of 36.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005910 has a value of 36.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111005910 has a value of 36.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111005910 (36.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (36.5%).
Prior Value
(36.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111005910 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111005911

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111005911

37.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111005911 has a value of 37.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111005911 has a value of 37.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111005911 has a value of 37.4% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111005911 (37.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (38.0%).
Prior Value
(38.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111005911 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111006000

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111006000

41.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006000 has a value of 41.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006000 has a value of 41.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111006000 has a value of 41.3% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111006000 (41.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (41.6%).
Prior Value
(41.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111006000 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111006100

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111006100

41.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006100 has a value of 41.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.7% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.1%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,036 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006100 has a value of 41.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,735 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.6%), 06111006100 has a value of 41.9% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111006100 (41.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (40.6%).
Prior Value
(40.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111006101

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111006101

38.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006101 has a value of 38.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006101 has a value of 38.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111006101 has a value of 38.8% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111006102

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111006102

45.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006102 has a value of 45.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006102 has a value of 45.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111006102 has a value of 45.1% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111006200

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111006200

32.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006200 has a value of 32.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006200 has a value of 32.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111006200 has a value of 32.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111006200 (32.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (33.7%).
Prior Value
(33.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111006200 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111006301

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111006301

36.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006301 has a value of 36.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006301 has a value of 36.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111006301 has a value of 36.2% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111006301 (36.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (36.0%).
Prior Value
(36.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111006301 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111006302

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111006302

37.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006302 has a value of 37.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006302 has a value of 37.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111006302 has a value of 37.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111006302 (37.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (37.2%).
Prior Value
(37.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111006302 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111006400

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111006400

35.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006400 has a value of 35.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006400 has a value of 35.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111006400 has a value of 35.9% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111006400 (35.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (36.8%).
Prior Value
(36.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111006400 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111006500

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111006500

42.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006500 has a value of 42.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006500 has a value of 42.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111006500 has a value of 42.7% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111006500 (42.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (43.4%).
Prior Value
(43.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111006500 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111006600

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111006600

37.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006600 has a value of 37.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006600 has a value of 37.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111006600 has a value of 37.4% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111006600 (37.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (37.2%).
Prior Value
(37.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111006600 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111006700

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111006700

37.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006700 has a value of 37.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006700 has a value of 37.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111006700 has a value of 37.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111006700 (37.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (36.8%).
Prior Value
(36.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111006700 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111006800

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111006800

39.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006800 has a value of 39.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006800 has a value of 39.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111006800 has a value of 39.9% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111006800 (39.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (39.9%).
Prior Value
(39.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111006800 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111006900

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111006900

38.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111006900 has a value of 38.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111006900 has a value of 38.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111006900 has a value of 38.5% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111006900 (38.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (37.6%).
Prior Value
(37.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111006900 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007000

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007000

42.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007000 has a value of 42.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007000 has a value of 42.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111007000 has a value of 42.6% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111007000 (42.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (42.6%).
Prior Value
(42.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111007000 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007100

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007100

41.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007100 has a value of 41.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007100 has a value of 41.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111007100 has a value of 41.9% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111007100 (41.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (41.8%).
Prior Value
(41.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111007100 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007201

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007201

35.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007201 has a value of 35.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007201 has a value of 35.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111007201 has a value of 35.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111007201 (35.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (36.4%).
Prior Value
(36.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111007201 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007202

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007202

34.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007202 has a value of 34.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007202 has a value of 34.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111007202 has a value of 34.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111007202 (34.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (34.6%).
Prior Value
(34.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111007202 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007300

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007300

31.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007300 has a value of 31.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007300 has a value of 31.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111007300 has a value of 31.9% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111007300 (31.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (33.4%).
Prior Value
(33.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111007300 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007402

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007402

34.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007402 has a value of 34.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007402 has a value of 34.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111007402 has a value of 34.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111007402 (34.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (35.2%).
Prior Value
(35.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111007402 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007403

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007403

39.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007403 has a value of 39.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007403 has a value of 39.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111007403 has a value of 39.7% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111007403 (39.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (40.1%).
Prior Value
(40.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111007403 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007405

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007405

38.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007405 has a value of 38.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007405 has a value of 38.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111007405 has a value of 38.7% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111007405 (38.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (39.3%).
Prior Value
(39.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111007405 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007406

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007406

37.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007406 has a value of 37.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007406 has a value of 37.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111007406 has a value of 37.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111007406 (37.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (38.3%).
Prior Value
(38.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111007406 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007505

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007505

40.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007505 has a value of 40.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007505 has a value of 40.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111007505 has a value of 40.2% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111007505 (40.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (40.3%).
Prior Value
(40.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111007505 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007506

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007506

40.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007506 has a value of 40.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007506 has a value of 40.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111007506 has a value of 40.4% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111007506 (40.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (39.2%).
Prior Value
(39.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111007506 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007507

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007507

36.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007507 has a value of 36.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007507 has a value of 36.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111007507 has a value of 36.1% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111007507 (36.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (37.6%).
Prior Value
(37.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111007507 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007508

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007508

39.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007508 has a value of 39.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007508 has a value of 39.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111007508 has a value of 39.3% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111007508 (39.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (39.5%).
Prior Value
(39.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111007508 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007509

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007509

42.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007509 has a value of 42.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007509 has a value of 42.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111007509 has a value of 42.5% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111007509 (42.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (41.9%).
Prior Value
(41.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111007509 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007510

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007510

35.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007510 has a value of 35.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007510 has a value of 35.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111007510 has a value of 35.1% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111007510 (35.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (36.7%).
Prior Value
(36.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111007510 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007511

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007511

35.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007511 has a value of 35.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007511 has a value of 35.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111007511 has a value of 35.1% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111007511 (35.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (36.2%).
Prior Value
(36.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111007511 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007512

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007512

41.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007512 has a value of 41.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007512 has a value of 41.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111007512 has a value of 41.5% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111007512 (41.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (42.1%).
Prior Value
(42.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111007512 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007513

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007513

33.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007513 has a value of 33.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007513 has a value of 33.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111007513 has a value of 33.9% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111007513 (33.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (34.1%).
Prior Value
(34.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111007513 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007514

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007514

39.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007514 has a value of 39.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.7% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.1%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,036 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007514 has a value of 39.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,735 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.6%), 06111007514 has a value of 39.2% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111007514 (39.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (38.7%).
Prior Value
(38.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007515

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007515

39.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007515 has a value of 39.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007515 has a value of 39.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111007515 has a value of 39.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007516

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007516

40.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007516 has a value of 40.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007516 has a value of 40.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111007516 has a value of 40.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007606

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007606

40.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007606 has a value of 40.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.7% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.1%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,036 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007606 has a value of 40.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,735 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.6%), 06111007606 has a value of 40.0% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111007606 (40.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (41.2%).
Prior Value
(41.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007607

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007607

37.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007607 has a value of 37.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007607 has a value of 37.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111007607 has a value of 37.3% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111007607 (37.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (38.3%).
Prior Value
(38.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111007607 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007609

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007609

37.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007609 has a value of 37.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007609 has a value of 37.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111007609 has a value of 37.0% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111007609 (37.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (38.1%).
Prior Value
(38.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111007609 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007610

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007610

39.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007610 has a value of 39.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007610 has a value of 39.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111007610 has a value of 39.8% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111007610 (39.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (39.7%).
Prior Value
(39.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111007610 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007611

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007611

46.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007611 has a value of 46.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007611 has a value of 46.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111007611 has a value of 46.7% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111007611 (46.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (48.2%).
Prior Value
(48.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111007611 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007612

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007612

42.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007612 has a value of 42.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007612 has a value of 42.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111007612 has a value of 42.8% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111007612 (42.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (42.4%).
Prior Value
(42.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111007612 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007613

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007613

41.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007613 has a value of 41.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007613 has a value of 41.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111007613 has a value of 41.8% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111007613 (41.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (41.7%).
Prior Value
(41.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111007613 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007614

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007614

40.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007614 has a value of 40.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007614 has a value of 40.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111007614 has a value of 40.1% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111007614 (40.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (40.6%).
Prior Value
(40.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111007614 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007700

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007700

43.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007700 has a value of 43.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007700 has a value of 43.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111007700 has a value of 43.4% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111007700 (43.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (43.2%).
Prior Value
(43.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111007700 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007800

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007800

43.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007800 has a value of 43.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007800 has a value of 43.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111007800 has a value of 43.1% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111007800 (43.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (43.6%).
Prior Value
(43.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111007800 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007901

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007901

43.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007901 has a value of 43.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007901 has a value of 43.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111007901 has a value of 43.5% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111007901 (43.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (43.9%).
Prior Value
(43.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111007901 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007903

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007903

41.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007903 has a value of 41.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007903 has a value of 41.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111007903 has a value of 41.2% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111007903 (41.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (41.4%).
Prior Value
(41.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111007903 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007904

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111007904

42.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007904 has a value of 42.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007904 has a value of 42.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111007904 has a value of 42.2% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111007904 (42.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (42.4%).
Prior Value
(42.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111007904 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008001

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008001

42.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008001 has a value of 42.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008001 has a value of 42.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111008001 has a value of 42.3% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111008001 (42.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (42.4%).
Prior Value
(42.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111008001 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008002

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008002

42.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008002 has a value of 42.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008002 has a value of 42.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111008002 has a value of 42.4% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111008002 (42.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (43.0%).
Prior Value
(43.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111008002 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008004

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008004

43.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008004 has a value of 43.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008004 has a value of 43.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111008004 has a value of 43.1% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111008004 (43.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (43.5%).
Prior Value
(43.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111008004 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008005

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008005

44.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008005 has a value of 44.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008005 has a value of 44.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111008005 has a value of 44.4% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111008005 (44.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (44.4%).
Prior Value
(44.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111008005 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008101

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008101

42.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008101 has a value of 42.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008101 has a value of 42.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111008101 has a value of 42.7% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111008101 (42.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (42.6%).
Prior Value
(42.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111008101 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008201

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008201

41.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008201 has a value of 41.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008201 has a value of 41.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111008201 has a value of 41.3% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111008201 (41.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (42.2%).
Prior Value
(42.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111008201 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008202

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008202

43.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008202 has a value of 43.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008202 has a value of 43.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111008202 has a value of 43.1% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111008202 (43.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (42.3%).
Prior Value
(42.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111008202 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008302

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008302

39.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008302 has a value of 39.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008302 has a value of 39.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111008302 has a value of 39.9% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111008302 (39.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (39.6%).
Prior Value
(39.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111008302 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008303

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008303

41.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008303 has a value of 41.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008303 has a value of 41.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111008303 has a value of 41.7% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111008303 (41.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (42.0%).
Prior Value
(42.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111008303 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008304

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008304

40.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008304 has a value of 40.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008304 has a value of 40.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111008304 has a value of 40.1% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111008304 (40.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (40.5%).
Prior Value
(40.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111008304 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008305

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008305

38.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008305 has a value of 38.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.7% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.1%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,036 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008305 has a value of 38.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,735 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.6%), 06111008305 has a value of 38.8% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111008305 (38.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (37.3%).
Prior Value
(37.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008306

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008306

43.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008306 has a value of 43.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.7% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.1%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,036 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008306 has a value of 43.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,735 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.6%), 06111008306 has a value of 43.1% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111008306 (43.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (42.0%).
Prior Value
(42.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008307

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008307

42.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008307 has a value of 42.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008307 has a value of 42.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111008307 has a value of 42.6% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008308

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008308

37.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008308 has a value of 37.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008308 has a value of 37.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111008308 has a value of 37.2% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008401

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008401

40.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008401 has a value of 40.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008401 has a value of 40.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111008401 has a value of 40.8% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111008401 (40.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (40.1%).
Prior Value
(40.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111008401 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008402

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008402

39.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008402 has a value of 39.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008402 has a value of 39.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111008402 has a value of 39.5% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111008402 (39.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (39.3%).
Prior Value
(39.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111008402 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008500

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008500

39.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008500 has a value of 39.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.7% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.1%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,036 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008500 has a value of 39.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,735 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.6%), 06111008500 has a value of 39.8% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111008500 (39.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (38.8%).
Prior Value
(38.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008501

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008501

37.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008501 has a value of 37.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008501 has a value of 37.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111008501 has a value of 37.1% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008502

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008502

42.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008502 has a value of 42.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008502 has a value of 42.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111008502 has a value of 42.5% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008600

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008600

45.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008600 has a value of 45.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.7% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.1%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,036 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008600 has a value of 45.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,735 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.6%), 06111008600 has a value of 45.9% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111008600 (45.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (44.3%).
Prior Value
(44.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008601

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008601

46.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008601 has a value of 46.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008601 has a value of 46.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111008601 has a value of 46.0% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008602

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008602

40.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008602 has a value of 40.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008602 has a value of 40.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111008602 has a value of 40.9% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008700

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008700

41.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008700 has a value of 41.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008700 has a value of 41.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111008700 has a value of 41.2% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111008700 (41.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (41.9%).
Prior Value
(41.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111008700 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008800

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008800

42.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008800 has a value of 42.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008800 has a value of 42.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111008800 has a value of 42.6% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111008800 (42.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (41.9%).
Prior Value
(41.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111008800 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008900

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111008900

48.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008900 has a value of 48.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008900 has a value of 48.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111008900 has a value of 48.5% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111008900 (48.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (49.1%).
Prior Value
(49.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111008900 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111009100

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111009100

48.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111009100 has a value of 48.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111009100 has a value of 48.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111009100 has a value of 48.2% which is higher and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111009100 (48.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (47.5%).
Prior Value
(47.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111009100 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111009200

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111009200

40.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111009200 has a value of 40.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111009200 has a value of 40.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111009200 has a value of 40.1% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111009300

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111009300

35.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111009300 has a value of 35.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111009300 has a value of 35.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111009300 has a value of 35.5% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111009400

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111009400

40.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111009400 has a value of 40.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111009400 has a value of 40.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111009400 has a value of 40.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111009500

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111009500

33.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111009500 has a value of 33.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111009500 has a value of 33.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111009500 has a value of 33.3% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111009600

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111009600

32.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111009600 has a value of 32.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111009600 has a value of 32.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111009600 has a value of 32.7% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111009700

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111009700

37.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111009700 has a value of 37.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111009700 has a value of 37.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111009700 has a value of 37.6% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111980000

Current Value:

Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days Census Tract: 06111980000

0.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111980000 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111980000 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 84,095 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (40.7%), 06111980000 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(40.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111980000 (0.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.0%).
Prior Value
(0.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 06111980000 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Child and Teen Fruit Consumption

Value
Compared to:

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Child and Teen Fruit Consumption

Value
Compared to:

Child and Teen Fruit Consumption County: Ventura

Current Value:

Child and Teen Fruit Consumption County: Ventura

63.1%
(2014-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Ventura has a value of 63.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.2%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 44 California counties and county groups.
Compared to the CA Value (64.3%), Ventura has a value of 63.1% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(64.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Ventura (63.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (71.4%).
Prior Value
(71.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Food Environment Index

Value
Compared to:

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Food Environment Index

Value
Compared to:

Food Environment Index County: Ventura

Current Value:

Food Environment Index County: Ventura

8.9
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Ventura has a value of 8.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 8.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.4.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ventura has a value of 8.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 6.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,108 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (8.6), Ventura has a value of 8.9 which is higher and better.
CA Value
(8.6)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (7.7), Ventura has a value of 8.9 which is higher and better.
US Value
(7.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ventura (8.9) is greater and better than the previously measured value (8.8).
Prior Value
(8.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ventura value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Physical Activity

Health / Physical Activity

Health / Physical Activity

Access to Exercise Opportunities

Value
Compared to:

Health / Physical Activity

Access to Exercise Opportunities

Value
Compared to:

Access to Exercise Opportunities County: Ventura

Current Value:

Access to Exercise Opportunities County: Ventura

97.8%
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Ventura has a value of 97.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 85.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 76.2%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ventura has a value of 97.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,096 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (94.2%), Ventura has a value of 97.8% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(94.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (84.1%), Ventura has a value of 97.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(84.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ventura (97.8%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (97.9%).
Prior Value
(97.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the VC 2020 Target (99.5%), the target has not been met.
VC 2020 Target
(99.5%)

Health / Physical Activity

Access to Parks

Value
Compared to:

Health / Physical Activity

Access to Parks

Value
Compared to:

Access to Parks County: Ventura

Current Value:

Access to Parks County: Ventura

82.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Ventura has a value of 82.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 55.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ventura has a value of 82.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 9.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (79.5%), Ventura has a value of 82.1% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(79.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Ventura (82.1%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (80.7%).
Prior Value
(80.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Health / Physical Activity

Adults who are Sedentary

Value
Compared to:

Health / Physical Activity

Adults who are Sedentary

Value
Compared to:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Place (City): Bell Canyon

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Place (City): Bell Canyon

15.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Bell Canyon has a value of 15.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Bell Canyon has a value of 15.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), Bell Canyon has a value of 15.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Place (City): Camarillo

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Place (City): Camarillo

19.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Camarillo has a value of 19.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Camarillo has a value of 19.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), Camarillo has a value of 19.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Place (City): Casa Conejo

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Place (City): Casa Conejo

18.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Casa Conejo has a value of 18.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Casa Conejo has a value of 18.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), Casa Conejo has a value of 18.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Place (City): Channel Islands Beach

Current Value:
17.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Channel Islands Beach has a value of 17.8% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Channel Islands Beach has a value of 17.8% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), Channel Islands Beach has a value of 17.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Place (City): El Rio

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Place (City): El Rio

30.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, El Rio has a value of 30.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, El Rio has a value of 30.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), El Rio has a value of 30.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Place (City): Fillmore

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Place (City): Fillmore

26.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Fillmore has a value of 26.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Fillmore has a value of 26.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), Fillmore has a value of 26.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Place (City): Lake Sherwood

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Place (City): Lake Sherwood

16.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Lake Sherwood has a value of 16.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Lake Sherwood has a value of 16.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), Lake Sherwood has a value of 16.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Place (City): Meiners Oaks

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Place (City): Meiners Oaks

20.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Meiners Oaks has a value of 20.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Meiners Oaks has a value of 20.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), Meiners Oaks has a value of 20.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Place (City): Mira Monte

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Place (City): Mira Monte

20.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Mira Monte has a value of 20.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Mira Monte has a value of 20.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), Mira Monte has a value of 20.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Place (City): Moorpark

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Place (City): Moorpark

17.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Moorpark has a value of 17.9% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Moorpark has a value of 17.9% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), Moorpark has a value of 17.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Place (City): Oak Park

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Place (City): Oak Park

14.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Oak Park has a value of 14.9% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Oak Park has a value of 14.9% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), Oak Park has a value of 14.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Place (City): Oak View

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Place (City): Oak View

20.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Oak View has a value of 20.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Oak View has a value of 20.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), Oak View has a value of 20.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Place (City): Ojai

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Place (City): Ojai

20.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Ojai has a value of 20.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Ojai has a value of 20.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), Ojai has a value of 20.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Place (City): Oxnard

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Place (City): Oxnard

28.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Oxnard has a value of 28.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Oxnard has a value of 28.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), Oxnard has a value of 28.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Place (City): Piru

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Place (City): Piru

26.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Piru has a value of 26.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Piru has a value of 26.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), Piru has a value of 26.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Place (City): Port Hueneme

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Place (City): Port Hueneme

25.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Port Hueneme has a value of 25.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Port Hueneme has a value of 25.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), Port Hueneme has a value of 25.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Place (City): San Buenaventura (Ventura)

Current Value:
20.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, San Buenaventura (Ventura) has a value of 20.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, San Buenaventura (Ventura) has a value of 20.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), San Buenaventura (Ventura) has a value of 20.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Place (City): Santa Paula

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Place (City): Santa Paula

29.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Santa Paula has a value of 29.8% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Santa Paula has a value of 29.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), Santa Paula has a value of 29.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Place (City): Santa Rosa Valley

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Place (City): Santa Rosa Valley

15.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Santa Rosa Valley has a value of 15.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Santa Rosa Valley has a value of 15.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), Santa Rosa Valley has a value of 15.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Place (City): Santa Susana

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Place (City): Santa Susana

17.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Santa Susana has a value of 17.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Santa Susana has a value of 17.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), Santa Susana has a value of 17.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Place (City): Saticoy

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Place (City): Saticoy

24.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Saticoy has a value of 24.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Saticoy has a value of 24.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), Saticoy has a value of 24.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Place (City): Simi Valley

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Place (City): Simi Valley

19.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Simi Valley has a value of 19.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Simi Valley has a value of 19.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), Simi Valley has a value of 19.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Place (City): Thousand Oaks

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Place (City): Thousand Oaks

17.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Thousand Oaks has a value of 17.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,462 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Thousand Oaks has a value of 17.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), Thousand Oaks has a value of 17.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 91320

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 91320

16.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 91320 has a value of 16.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,750 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 91320 has a value of 16.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,520 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 91320 has a value of 16.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 91360

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 91360

18.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 91360 has a value of 18.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,750 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 91360 has a value of 18.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,520 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 91360 has a value of 18.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 91361

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 91361

16.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 91361 has a value of 16.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,750 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 91361 has a value of 16.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,520 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 91361 has a value of 16.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 91362

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 91362

17.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 91362 has a value of 17.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,750 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 91362 has a value of 17.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,520 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 91362 has a value of 17.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 91377

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 91377

14.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 91377 has a value of 14.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,750 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 91377 has a value of 14.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,520 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 91377 has a value of 14.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 93001

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 93001

21.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93001 has a value of 21.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,750 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93001 has a value of 21.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,520 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 93001 has a value of 21.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 93003

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 93003

20.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93003 has a value of 20.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,750 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93003 has a value of 20.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,520 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 93003 has a value of 20.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 93004

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 93004

19.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93004 has a value of 19.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,750 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93004 has a value of 19.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,520 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 93004 has a value of 19.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 93010

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 93010

19.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93010 has a value of 19.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,750 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93010 has a value of 19.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,520 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 93010 has a value of 19.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 93012

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 93012

18.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93012 has a value of 18.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,750 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93012 has a value of 18.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,520 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 93012 has a value of 18.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 93015

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 93015

26.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93015 has a value of 26.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,750 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93015 has a value of 26.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,520 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 93015 has a value of 26.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 93021

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 93021

17.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93021 has a value of 17.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,750 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93021 has a value of 17.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,520 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 93021 has a value of 17.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 93022

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 93022

20.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93022 has a value of 20.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,750 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93022 has a value of 20.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,520 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 93022 has a value of 20.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 93023

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 93023

20.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93023 has a value of 20.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,750 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93023 has a value of 20.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,520 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 93023 has a value of 20.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 93030

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 93030

28.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93030 has a value of 28.7% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,750 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93030 has a value of 28.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,520 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 93030 has a value of 28.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 93033

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 93033

31.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93033 has a value of 31.7% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,750 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93033 has a value of 31.7% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,520 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 93033 has a value of 31.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 93035

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 93035

21.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93035 has a value of 21.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,750 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93035 has a value of 21.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,520 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 93035 has a value of 21.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 93036

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 93036

25.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93036 has a value of 25.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,750 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93036 has a value of 25.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,520 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 93036 has a value of 25.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 93040

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 93040

26.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93040 has a value of 26.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,750 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93040 has a value of 26.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,520 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 93040 has a value of 26.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 93041

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 93041

25.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93041 has a value of 25.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,750 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93041 has a value of 25.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,520 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 93041 has a value of 25.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 93042

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 93042

13.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93042 has a value of 13.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.1%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93042 has a value of 13.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 93042 has a value of 13.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 93043

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 93043

13.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93043 has a value of 13.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,750 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93043 has a value of 13.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,520 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 93043 has a value of 13.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 93060

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 93060

29.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93060 has a value of 29.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,750 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93060 has a value of 29.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,520 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 93060 has a value of 29.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 93063

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 93063

19.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93063 has a value of 19.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,750 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93063 has a value of 19.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,520 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 93063 has a value of 19.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 93064

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 93064

20.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93064 has a value of 20.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,750 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93064 has a value of 20.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,520 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 93064 has a value of 20.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 93065

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 93065

18.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93065 has a value of 18.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,750 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93065 has a value of 18.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,520 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 93065 has a value of 18.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 93066

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Zip Code: 93066

19.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93066 has a value of 19.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,750 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 93066 has a value of 19.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,520 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 93066 has a value of 19.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111000100

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111000100

17.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000100 has a value of 17.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.7% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.6%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000100 has a value of 17.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111000100 has a value of 17.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111000200

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111000200

27.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000200 has a value of 27.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.7% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.6%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000200 has a value of 27.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111000200 has a value of 27.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111000302

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111000302

25.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000302 has a value of 25.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000302 has a value of 25.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111000302 has a value of 25.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111000303

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111000303

22.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000303 has a value of 22.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000303 has a value of 22.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111000303 has a value of 22.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111000304

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111000304

31.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000304 has a value of 31.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000304 has a value of 31.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111000304 has a value of 31.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111000400

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111000400

31.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000400 has a value of 31.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000400 has a value of 31.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111000400 has a value of 31.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111000500

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111000500

26.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000500 has a value of 26.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111000500 has a value of 26.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111000500 has a value of 26.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)