Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Prevention of Chronic Conditions by Promoting Healthy Lifestyles

This is a priority based on the 2022-2024 Community Health Needs Assessment, which includes:
  • Cancer
  • Diabetes
  • Heart Disease and Stroke
  • Nutrition and Healthy Eating
  • Physical Activity
  • Weight Status

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

green chart bars Significantly better than the overall value

red chart bars Significantly worse than the overall value

dark blue chart bars Significantly different than the overall value

light blue chart bars No significant difference with the overall value

gray chart bars No data on significance available

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Physical Activity

Health / Physical Activity

Health / Physical Activity

Adults who are Sedentary

Value
Compared to:

Health / Physical Activity

Adults who are Sedentary

Value
Compared to:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007202

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007202

14.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007202 has a value of 14.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007202 has a value of 14.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111007202 has a value of 14.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007300

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007300

16.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007300 has a value of 16.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007300 has a value of 16.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111007300 has a value of 16.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007402

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007402

16.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007402 has a value of 16.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007402 has a value of 16.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111007402 has a value of 16.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007403

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007403

15.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007403 has a value of 15.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007403 has a value of 15.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111007403 has a value of 15.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007405

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007405

14.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007405 has a value of 14.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007405 has a value of 14.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111007405 has a value of 14.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007406

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007406

14.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007406 has a value of 14.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007406 has a value of 14.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111007406 has a value of 14.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007505

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007505

20.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007505 has a value of 20.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007505 has a value of 20.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111007505 has a value of 20.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007506

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007506

17.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007506 has a value of 17.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007506 has a value of 17.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111007506 has a value of 17.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007507

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007507

14.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007507 has a value of 14.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007507 has a value of 14.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111007507 has a value of 14.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007508

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007508

18.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007508 has a value of 18.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007508 has a value of 18.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111007508 has a value of 18.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007509

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007509

15.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007509 has a value of 15.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007509 has a value of 15.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111007509 has a value of 15.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007510

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007510

16.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007510 has a value of 16.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007510 has a value of 16.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111007510 has a value of 16.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007511

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007511

15.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007511 has a value of 15.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007511 has a value of 15.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111007511 has a value of 15.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007512

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007512

18.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007512 has a value of 18.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007512 has a value of 18.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111007512 has a value of 18.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007513

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007513

16.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007513 has a value of 16.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007513 has a value of 16.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111007513 has a value of 16.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007514

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007514

15.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007514 has a value of 15.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.7% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.6%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007514 has a value of 15.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111007514 has a value of 15.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007515

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007515

16.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007515 has a value of 16.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007515 has a value of 16.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111007515 has a value of 16.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007516

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007516

17.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007516 has a value of 17.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007516 has a value of 17.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111007516 has a value of 17.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007606

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007606

13.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007606 has a value of 13.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.7% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.6%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007606 has a value of 13.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111007606 has a value of 13.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007607

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007607

15.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007607 has a value of 15.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007607 has a value of 15.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111007607 has a value of 15.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007609

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007609

15.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007609 has a value of 15.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007609 has a value of 15.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111007609 has a value of 15.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007610

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007610

16.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007610 has a value of 16.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007610 has a value of 16.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111007610 has a value of 16.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007611

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007611

24.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007611 has a value of 24.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007611 has a value of 24.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111007611 has a value of 24.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007612

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007612

19.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007612 has a value of 19.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007612 has a value of 19.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111007612 has a value of 19.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007613

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007613

16.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007613 has a value of 16.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007613 has a value of 16.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111007613 has a value of 16.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007614

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007614

17.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007614 has a value of 17.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007614 has a value of 17.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111007614 has a value of 17.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007700

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007700

19.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007700 has a value of 19.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007700 has a value of 19.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111007700 has a value of 19.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007800

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007800

22.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007800 has a value of 22.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007800 has a value of 22.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111007800 has a value of 22.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007901

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007901

21.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007901 has a value of 21.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007901 has a value of 21.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111007901 has a value of 21.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007903

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007903

16.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007903 has a value of 16.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007903 has a value of 16.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111007903 has a value of 16.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007904

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111007904

19.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111007904 has a value of 19.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111007904 has a value of 19.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111007904 has a value of 19.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008001

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008001

20.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008001 has a value of 20.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008001 has a value of 20.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111008001 has a value of 20.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008002

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008002

22.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008002 has a value of 22.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008002 has a value of 22.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111008002 has a value of 22.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008004

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008004

17.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008004 has a value of 17.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008004 has a value of 17.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111008004 has a value of 17.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008005

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008005

21.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008005 has a value of 21.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008005 has a value of 21.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111008005 has a value of 21.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008101

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008101

21.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008101 has a value of 21.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008101 has a value of 21.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111008101 has a value of 21.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008201

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008201

20.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008201 has a value of 20.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008201 has a value of 20.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111008201 has a value of 20.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008202

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008202

23.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008202 has a value of 23.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008202 has a value of 23.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111008202 has a value of 23.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008302

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008302

18.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008302 has a value of 18.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008302 has a value of 18.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111008302 has a value of 18.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008303

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008303

19.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008303 has a value of 19.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008303 has a value of 19.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111008303 has a value of 19.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008304

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008304

22.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008304 has a value of 22.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008304 has a value of 22.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111008304 has a value of 22.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008305

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008305

13.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008305 has a value of 13.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.7% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.6%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008305 has a value of 13.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111008305 has a value of 13.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008306

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008306

15.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008306 has a value of 15.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.7% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.6%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008306 has a value of 15.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111008306 has a value of 15.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008307

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008307

18.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008307 has a value of 18.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008307 has a value of 18.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111008307 has a value of 18.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008308

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008308

13.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008308 has a value of 13.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008308 has a value of 13.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111008308 has a value of 13.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008401

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008401

22.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008401 has a value of 22.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008401 has a value of 22.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111008401 has a value of 22.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008402

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008402

18.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008402 has a value of 18.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008402 has a value of 18.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111008402 has a value of 18.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008500

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008500

14.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008500 has a value of 14.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.7% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.6%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008500 has a value of 14.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111008500 has a value of 14.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008501

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008501

16.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008501 has a value of 16.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008501 has a value of 16.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111008501 has a value of 16.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008502

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008502

15.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008502 has a value of 15.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008502 has a value of 15.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111008502 has a value of 15.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008600

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008600

28.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008600 has a value of 28.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.7% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.6%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008600 has a value of 28.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111008600 has a value of 28.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008601

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008601

29.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008601 has a value of 29.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008601 has a value of 29.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111008601 has a value of 29.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008602

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008602

30.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008602 has a value of 30.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008602 has a value of 30.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111008602 has a value of 30.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008700

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008700

34.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008700 has a value of 34.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008700 has a value of 34.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111008700 has a value of 34.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008800

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008800

28.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008800 has a value of 28.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008800 has a value of 28.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111008800 has a value of 28.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008900

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111008900

25.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111008900 has a value of 25.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111008900 has a value of 25.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111008900 has a value of 25.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111009100

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111009100

39.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111009100 has a value of 39.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111009100 has a value of 39.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111009100 has a value of 39.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111009200

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111009200

23.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111009200 has a value of 23.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111009200 has a value of 23.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111009200 has a value of 23.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111009300

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111009300

19.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111009300 has a value of 19.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111009300 has a value of 19.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111009300 has a value of 19.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111009400

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111009400

18.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111009400 has a value of 18.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111009400 has a value of 18.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111009400 has a value of 18.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111009500

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111009500

21.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111009500 has a value of 21.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111009500 has a value of 21.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111009500 has a value of 21.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111009600

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111009600

16.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111009600 has a value of 16.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111009600 has a value of 16.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111009600 has a value of 16.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111009700

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111009700

26.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111009700 has a value of 26.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,070 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111009700 has a value of 26.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,646 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111009700 has a value of 26.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111980000

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary Census Tract: 06111980000

13.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111980000 has a value of 13.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.7% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.6%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06111980000 has a value of 13.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), 06111980000 has a value of 13.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Health / Physical Activity

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine

Value
Compared to:

Health / Physical Activity

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine

Value
Compared to:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine County: Ventura

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine County: Ventura

73.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Ventura has a value of 73.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (69.3%), Ventura has a value of 73.1% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(69.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (67.2%), Ventura has a value of 73.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ventura (73.1%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (66.4%).
Prior Value
(66.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): Bell Canyon

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): Bell Canyon

90.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Bell Canyon has a value of 90.9% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to CA Census Places, Bell Canyon has a value of 90.9% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,516 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), Bell Canyon has a value of 90.9% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (69.3%), Bell Canyon has a value of 90.9% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(69.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (67.2%), Bell Canyon has a value of 90.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Bell Canyon (90.9%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (77.4%).
Prior Value
(77.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): Camarillo

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): Camarillo

76.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Camarillo has a value of 76.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to CA Census Places, Camarillo has a value of 76.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,516 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), Camarillo has a value of 76.4% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (69.3%), Camarillo has a value of 76.4% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(69.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (67.2%), Camarillo has a value of 76.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Camarillo (76.4%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (68.9%).
Prior Value
(68.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): Casa Conejo

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): Casa Conejo

76.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Casa Conejo has a value of 76.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to CA Census Places, Casa Conejo has a value of 76.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,516 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), Casa Conejo has a value of 76.7% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (69.3%), Casa Conejo has a value of 76.7% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(69.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (67.2%), Casa Conejo has a value of 76.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Casa Conejo (76.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (66.7%).
Prior Value
(66.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): Channel Islands Beach

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): Channel Islands Beach

80.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Channel Islands Beach has a value of 80.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to CA Census Places, Channel Islands Beach has a value of 80.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,516 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), Channel Islands Beach has a value of 80.4% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (69.3%), Channel Islands Beach has a value of 80.4% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(69.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (67.2%), Channel Islands Beach has a value of 80.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Channel Islands Beach (80.4%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (68.6%).
Prior Value
(68.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): El Rio

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): El Rio

61.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, El Rio has a value of 61.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to CA Census Places, El Rio has a value of 61.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,516 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), El Rio has a value of 61.0% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (69.3%), El Rio has a value of 61.0% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(69.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (67.2%), El Rio has a value of 61.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, El Rio (61.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (48.1%).
Prior Value
(48.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): Fillmore

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): Fillmore

65.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fillmore has a value of 65.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to CA Census Places, Fillmore has a value of 65.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,516 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), Fillmore has a value of 65.0% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (69.3%), Fillmore has a value of 65.0% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(69.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (67.2%), Fillmore has a value of 65.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Fillmore (65.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (52.1%).
Prior Value
(52.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): Lake Sherwood

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): Lake Sherwood

79.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Lake Sherwood has a value of 79.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to CA Census Places, Lake Sherwood has a value of 79.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,516 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), Lake Sherwood has a value of 79.1% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (69.3%), Lake Sherwood has a value of 79.1% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(69.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (67.2%), Lake Sherwood has a value of 79.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake Sherwood (79.1%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (71.8%).
Prior Value
(71.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): Meiners Oaks

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): Meiners Oaks

77.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Meiners Oaks has a value of 77.5% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to CA Census Places, Meiners Oaks has a value of 77.5% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,516 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), Meiners Oaks has a value of 77.5% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (69.3%), Meiners Oaks has a value of 77.5% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(69.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (67.2%), Meiners Oaks has a value of 77.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Meiners Oaks (77.5%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (64.1%).
Prior Value
(64.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): Mira Monte

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): Mira Monte

78.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mira Monte has a value of 78.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to CA Census Places, Mira Monte has a value of 78.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,516 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), Mira Monte has a value of 78.4% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (69.3%), Mira Monte has a value of 78.4% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(69.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (67.2%), Mira Monte has a value of 78.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mira Monte (78.4%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (65.7%).
Prior Value
(65.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): Moorpark

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): Moorpark

78.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Moorpark has a value of 78.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to CA Census Places, Moorpark has a value of 78.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,516 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), Moorpark has a value of 78.7% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (69.3%), Moorpark has a value of 78.7% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(69.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (67.2%), Moorpark has a value of 78.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Moorpark (78.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (73.1%).
Prior Value
(73.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): Oak Park

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): Oak Park

86.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Oak Park has a value of 86.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to CA Census Places, Oak Park has a value of 86.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,516 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), Oak Park has a value of 86.1% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (69.3%), Oak Park has a value of 86.1% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(69.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (67.2%), Oak Park has a value of 86.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Oak Park (86.1%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (80.9%).
Prior Value
(80.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): Oak View

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): Oak View

77.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Oak View has a value of 77.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to CA Census Places, Oak View has a value of 77.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,516 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), Oak View has a value of 77.3% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (69.3%), Oak View has a value of 77.3% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(69.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (67.2%), Oak View has a value of 77.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Oak View (77.3%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (64.0%).
Prior Value
(64.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): Ojai

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): Ojai

81.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Ojai has a value of 81.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to CA Census Places, Ojai has a value of 81.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,516 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), Ojai has a value of 81.3% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (69.3%), Ojai has a value of 81.3% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(69.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (67.2%), Ojai has a value of 81.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ojai (81.3%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (68.8%).
Prior Value
(68.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): Oxnard

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): Oxnard

64.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Oxnard has a value of 64.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to CA Census Places, Oxnard has a value of 64.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,516 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), Oxnard has a value of 64.4% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (69.3%), Oxnard has a value of 64.4% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(69.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (67.2%), Oxnard has a value of 64.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Oxnard (64.4%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (58.0%).
Prior Value
(58.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): Piru

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): Piru

59.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Piru has a value of 59.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to CA Census Places, Piru has a value of 59.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,516 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), Piru has a value of 59.3% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (69.3%), Piru has a value of 59.3% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(69.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (67.2%), Piru has a value of 59.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Piru (59.3%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (40.7%).
Prior Value
(40.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): Port Hueneme

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): Port Hueneme

63.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Port Hueneme has a value of 63.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to CA Census Places, Port Hueneme has a value of 63.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,516 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), Port Hueneme has a value of 63.2% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (69.3%), Port Hueneme has a value of 63.2% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(69.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (67.2%), Port Hueneme has a value of 63.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Port Hueneme (63.2%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (55.5%).
Prior Value
(55.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): San Buenaventura (Ventura)

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): San Buenaventura (Ventura)

71.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, San Buenaventura (Ventura) has a value of 71.8% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to CA Census Places, San Buenaventura (Ventura) has a value of 71.8% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,516 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), San Buenaventura (Ventura) has a value of 71.8% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (69.3%), San Buenaventura (Ventura) has a value of 71.8% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(69.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (67.2%), San Buenaventura (Ventura) has a value of 71.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, San Buenaventura (Ventura) (71.8%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (64.4%).
Prior Value
(64.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): Santa Paula

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): Santa Paula

61.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Santa Paula has a value of 61.9% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to CA Census Places, Santa Paula has a value of 61.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,516 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), Santa Paula has a value of 61.9% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (69.3%), Santa Paula has a value of 61.9% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(69.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (67.2%), Santa Paula has a value of 61.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Santa Paula (61.9%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (53.0%).
Prior Value
(53.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): Santa Rosa Valley

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): Santa Rosa Valley

95.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Santa Rosa Valley has a value of 95.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to CA Census Places, Santa Rosa Valley has a value of 95.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,516 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), Santa Rosa Valley has a value of 95.3% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (69.3%), Santa Rosa Valley has a value of 95.3% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(69.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (67.2%), Santa Rosa Valley has a value of 95.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Santa Rosa Valley (95.3%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (89.1%).
Prior Value
(89.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): Santa Susana

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): Santa Susana

77.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Santa Susana has a value of 77.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to CA Census Places, Santa Susana has a value of 77.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,516 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), Santa Susana has a value of 77.7% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (69.3%), Santa Susana has a value of 77.7% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(69.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (67.2%), Santa Susana has a value of 77.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Santa Susana (77.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (66.0%).
Prior Value
(66.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): Saticoy

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): Saticoy

73.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Saticoy has a value of 73.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to CA Census Places, Saticoy has a value of 73.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,516 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), Saticoy has a value of 73.7% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (69.3%), Saticoy has a value of 73.7% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(69.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (67.2%), Saticoy has a value of 73.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Saticoy (73.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (60.1%).
Prior Value
(60.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): Simi Valley

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): Simi Valley

76.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Simi Valley has a value of 76.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to CA Census Places, Simi Valley has a value of 76.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,516 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), Simi Valley has a value of 76.3% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (69.3%), Simi Valley has a value of 76.3% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(69.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (67.2%), Simi Valley has a value of 76.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Simi Valley (76.3%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (68.6%).
Prior Value
(68.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): Thousand Oaks

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Place (City): Thousand Oaks

81.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Thousand Oaks has a value of 81.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to CA Census Places, Thousand Oaks has a value of 81.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,516 locales.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), Thousand Oaks has a value of 81.4% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the CA Value (69.3%), Thousand Oaks has a value of 81.4% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(69.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (67.2%), Thousand Oaks has a value of 81.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Thousand Oaks (81.4%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (76.8%).
Prior Value
(76.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 91320

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 91320

82.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 91320 has a value of 82.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,773 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 91320 has a value of 82.6% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 91320 (82.6%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (78.1%).
Prior Value
(78.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 91360

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 91360

79.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 91360 has a value of 79.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,773 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 91360 has a value of 79.1% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 91360 (79.1%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (73.9%).
Prior Value
(73.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 91361

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 91361

85.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 91361 has a value of 85.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,773 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 91361 has a value of 85.0% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 91361 (85.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (78.0%).
Prior Value
(78.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 91362

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 91362

82.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 91362 has a value of 82.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,773 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 91362 has a value of 82.3% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 91362 (82.3%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (78.9%).
Prior Value
(78.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 91377

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 91377

86.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 91377 has a value of 86.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,773 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 91377 has a value of 86.1% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 91377 (86.1%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (80.9%).
Prior Value
(80.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 93001

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 93001

67.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93001 has a value of 67.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,773 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 93001 has a value of 67.4% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93001 (67.4%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (59.3%).
Prior Value
(59.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 93003

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 93003

72.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93003 has a value of 72.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,773 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 93003 has a value of 72.9% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93003 (72.9%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (65.4%).
Prior Value
(65.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 93004

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 93004

75.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93004 has a value of 75.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,773 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 93004 has a value of 75.1% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93004 (75.1%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (67.2%).
Prior Value
(67.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 93010

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 93010

75.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93010 has a value of 75.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,773 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 93010 has a value of 75.8% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93010 (75.8%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (69.7%).
Prior Value
(69.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 93012

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 93012

79.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93012 has a value of 79.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,773 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 93012 has a value of 79.5% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93012 (79.5%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (70.8%).
Prior Value
(70.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 93015

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 93015

65.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93015 has a value of 65.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,773 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 93015 has a value of 65.3% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93015 (65.3%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (52.2%).
Prior Value
(52.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 93021

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 93021

79.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93021 has a value of 79.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,773 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 93021 has a value of 79.1% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93021 (79.1%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (73.4%).
Prior Value
(73.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 93022

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 93022

77.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93022 has a value of 77.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,773 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 93022 has a value of 77.3% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93022 (77.3%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (65.1%).
Prior Value
(65.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 93023

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 93023

78.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93023 has a value of 78.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,773 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 93023 has a value of 78.8% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93023 (78.8%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (66.6%).
Prior Value
(66.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 93030

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 93030

64.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93030 has a value of 64.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,773 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 93030 has a value of 64.0% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93030 (64.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (57.8%).
Prior Value
(57.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 93033

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 93033

59.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93033 has a value of 59.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,773 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 93033 has a value of 59.5% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93033 (59.5%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (53.9%).
Prior Value
(53.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 93035

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 93035

74.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93035 has a value of 74.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,773 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 93035 has a value of 74.4% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93035 (74.4%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (67.4%).
Prior Value
(67.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 93036

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 93036

66.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93036 has a value of 66.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,773 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 93036 has a value of 66.0% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93036 (66.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (56.8%).
Prior Value
(56.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 93040

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 93040

59.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93040 has a value of 59.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,773 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 93040 has a value of 59.2% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93040 (59.2%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (40.8%).
Prior Value
(40.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 93041

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 93041

63.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93041 has a value of 63.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,773 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 93041 has a value of 63.0% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93041 (63.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (55.0%).
Prior Value
(55.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 93042

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 93042

57.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93042 has a value of 57.7% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,773 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 93042 has a value of 57.7% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93042 (57.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (40.5%).
Prior Value
(40.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 93043

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 93043

57.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93043 has a value of 57.6% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,773 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 93043 has a value of 57.6% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93043 (57.6%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (43.5%).
Prior Value
(43.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 93060

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 93060

62.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93060 has a value of 62.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,773 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 93060 has a value of 62.9% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93060 (62.9%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (53.4%).
Prior Value
(53.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 93063

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 93063

76.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93063 has a value of 76.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,773 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 93063 has a value of 76.8% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93063 (76.8%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (68.5%).
Prior Value
(68.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 93065

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 93065

76.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93065 has a value of 76.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,773 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 93065 has a value of 76.2% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93065 (76.2%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (68.8%).
Prior Value
(68.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 93066

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Zip Code: 93066

72.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 93066 has a value of 72.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,773 California zip codes.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 93066 has a value of 72.4% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 93066 (72.4%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (66.4%).
Prior Value
(66.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111000100

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111000100

51.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000100 has a value of 51.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 59.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,036 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (66.4%), 06111000100 has a value of 51.4% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111000200

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111000200

40.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000200 has a value of 40.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 59.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,036 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (66.4%), 06111000200 has a value of 40.9% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111000302

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111000302

65.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000302 has a value of 65.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 06111000302 has a value of 65.6% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111000302 (65.6%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (52.6%).
Prior Value
(52.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111000303

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111000303

65.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000303 has a value of 65.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 06111000303 has a value of 65.1% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111000303 (65.1%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (53.1%).
Prior Value
(53.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111000304

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111000304

66.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000304 has a value of 66.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 06111000304 has a value of 66.6% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111000304 (66.6%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (53.5%).
Prior Value
(53.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111000400

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111000400

66.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000400 has a value of 66.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 06111000400 has a value of 66.1% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111000400 (66.1%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (56.4%).
Prior Value
(56.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111000500

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111000500

67.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000500 has a value of 67.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 06111000500 has a value of 67.4% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111000500 (67.4%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (56.2%).
Prior Value
(56.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111000600

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111000600

52.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000600 has a value of 52.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 06111000600 has a value of 52.1% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111000600 (52.1%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (43.5%).
Prior Value
(43.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111000701

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111000701

55.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000701 has a value of 55.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 06111000701 has a value of 55.7% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111000701 (55.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (45.8%).
Prior Value
(45.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111000702

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111000702

67.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000702 has a value of 67.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 06111000702 has a value of 67.2% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111000702 (67.2%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (57.0%).
Prior Value
(57.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111000800

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111000800

71.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000800 has a value of 71.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 06111000800 has a value of 71.1% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111000800 (71.1%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (60.8%).
Prior Value
(60.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111000901

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111000901

85.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000901 has a value of 85.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 06111000901 has a value of 85.6% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111000901 (85.6%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (72.5%).
Prior Value
(72.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111000902

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111000902

81.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000902 has a value of 81.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 06111000902 has a value of 81.1% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111000902 (81.1%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (69.7%).
Prior Value
(69.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111000903

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111000903

77.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111000903 has a value of 77.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 06111000903 has a value of 77.3% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111000903 (77.3%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (67.8%).
Prior Value
(67.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111001001

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111001001

64.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001001 has a value of 64.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 59.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,036 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (66.4%), 06111001001 has a value of 64.1% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111001002

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111001002

76.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001002 has a value of 76.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 06111001002 has a value of 76.2% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111001002 (76.2%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (62.6%).
Prior Value
(62.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111001101

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111001101

75.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001101 has a value of 75.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 06111001101 has a value of 75.2% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111001101 (75.2%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (61.6%).
Prior Value
(61.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111001102

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111001102

83.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001102 has a value of 83.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 06111001102 has a value of 83.1% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111001102 (83.1%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (71.5%).
Prior Value
(71.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111001201

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111001201

71.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001201 has a value of 71.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 06111001201 has a value of 71.2% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111001201 (71.2%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (60.8%).
Prior Value
(60.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111001202

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111001202

85.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001202 has a value of 85.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 06111001202 has a value of 85.3% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111001202 (85.3%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (79.5%).
Prior Value
(79.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111001204

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111001204

63.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001204 has a value of 63.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 06111001204 has a value of 63.9% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111001204 (63.9%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (41.3%).
Prior Value
(41.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111001206

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111001206

65.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001206 has a value of 65.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 59.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,036 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (66.4%), 06111001206 has a value of 65.9% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111001301

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111001301

63.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001301 has a value of 63.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 59.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,036 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (66.4%), 06111001301 has a value of 63.7% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111001302

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111001302

73.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001302 has a value of 73.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 06111001302 has a value of 73.7% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111001302 (73.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (60.1%).
Prior Value
(60.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111001303

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111001303

72.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001303 has a value of 72.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 06111001303 has a value of 72.1% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111001304

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111001304

73.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001304 has a value of 73.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 06111001304 has a value of 73.6% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111001401

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111001401

80.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001401 has a value of 80.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 06111001401 has a value of 80.1% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111001401 (80.1%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (70.6%).
Prior Value
(70.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111001402

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111001402

71.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001402 has a value of 71.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 06111001402 has a value of 71.1% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111001402 (71.1%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (65.4%).
Prior Value
(65.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111001502

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111001502

56.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001502 has a value of 56.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 59.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,036 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (66.4%), 06111001502 has a value of 56.3% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111001503

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111001503

53.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001503 has a value of 53.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 59.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,036 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (66.4%), 06111001503 has a value of 53.5% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111001506

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111001506

70.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001506 has a value of 70.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 06111001506 has a value of 70.5% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111001506 (70.5%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (66.6%).
Prior Value
(66.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111001507

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111001507

69.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001507 has a value of 69.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 06111001507 has a value of 69.7% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.
Compared to the prior value, 06111001507 (69.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (60.3%).
Prior Value
(60.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111001508

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111001508

73.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001508 has a value of 73.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 06111001508 has a value of 73.6% which is higher and better.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111001509

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111001509

56.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001509 has a value of 56.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 06111001509 has a value of 56.6% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111001510

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111001510

69.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001510 has a value of 69.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 06111001510 has a value of 69.4% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111001511

Current Value:

Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine Census Tract: 06111001511

62.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06111001511 has a value of 62.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,107 California census tracts.
Compared to the Ventura, CA County Value (73.1%), 06111001511 has a value of 62.4% which is lower and worse.
Ventura, CA County Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Ventura County value.